Publication Cover
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences
An International Geoscience Journal of the Geological Society of Australia
Volume 50, 2003 - Issue 5
59
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Shoemaker impact structure, Western Australia

, , , &
Pages 775-796 | Published online: 08 Nov 2010
 

The Shoemaker impact structure, on the southern margin of the Palaeoproterozoic Earaheedy Basin, with an outer diameter of ∼⃒30 km, consists of two well‐defined concentric ring structures surrounding a granitoid basement uplift. The concentric structures, including a ring syncline and a ring anticline, formed in sedimentary rocks of the Earaheedy Group. In addition, aeromagnetic and geological field observations suggest that Shoemaker is a deeply eroded structure. The central 12 km‐diameter uplift consists of fractured Archaean basement granitoids of syenitic composition (Teague Granite). Shock‐metamorphic features include shatter cones in sedimentary rocks and planar deformation features in quartz crystals of the Teague Granite. Universal‐stage analysis of 51 sets of planar deformation features in 18 quartz grains indicate dominance of sets parallel to ω {1013}, but absence of sets parallel to π {1012}, implying peak shock pressures in the range of 10–20 GPa for the analysed sample. Geophysical characteristics of the structure include a —100 μs ‐2 gravity anomaly coincident with the central uplift and positive circular trends in both magnetic and gravity correlating with the inner ring syncline and outer ring anticline. The Teague Granite is dominated by albite‐quartz‐K‐feldspar with subordinate amounts of alkali pyroxene. The alkali‐rich syenitic composition suggests it could either represent a member of the Late Archaean plutonic suite or the product of alkali metasomatism related to impact‐generated hydrothermal activity. In places, the Teague Granite exhibits partial to pervasive silicification and contains hydrothermal minerals, including amphibole, garnet, sericite and prehnite. Recent isotopic age studies of the Teague Granite suggest an older age limit of ca 1300 Ma (Ar–Ar on K‐feldspar) and a younger age limit of ca 568 Ma (K–Ar on illite‐smectite).The significance of the K–Ar age of 568 Ma is not clear, and it might represent either hydrothermal activity triggered by impact‐related energy or a possible resetting by tectonothermal events in the region.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.