ABSTRACT
In Science, great difficulty is sometimes experienced in giving up hypothesized structures. The inadequacies of Freudian hypotheses are highlighted, and attention is directed to Dasein-analysis, which stays close to the data. This perspective focuses attention upon the phenomenological tradition, and suggests that certain mathematical frameworks in human geography are inappropriate. The adequacy of a priori models is also questioned from a Heideggerian perspective, and more general qualitative algebras are suggested to replace the distorted functional thinking inherited from the physical sciences.
Notes
∗A seminar presentation to the Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, September 23, 1980. I am deeply grateful to the philosopher Joseph Kockelmans for reading the original paper, and making a number of suggestions, improvements, and corrections.