![Sample our Geography journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5937/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Geography.jpg"})
Abstract
ABSTRACT. The tendency to reduce the role of places in the formation of sociospatial identities and to emphasize the impact of sociopolitical structures on place making is growing. We argue that, under certain conditions, places may become salient sources of identity formation. In addition, we suggest viewing different types of places on a continuum from mythical “big places,” to everyday‐life places, to parochial “little places.” We further suggest a distinction between mythical and everyday‐life senses of place. Following Zali Gurevitz, who describes the characteristics of West Bank Jewish settlers' mythical sense of place, we demonstrate how Gaza settlers only partially internalized their conception of place, adopting an everyday‐life conception of thereof. Yet place became a main source of identity for Gaza settlers, who viewed their experience in the settlements as an empowering process that helped them escape their marginality and join the national elite.
1 Dr. Schnell is a professor of geography and human environment at Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel, where Dr. Mishal is a professor of political science.
1 Dr. Schnell is a professor of geography and human environment at Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel, where Dr. Mishal is a professor of political science.
Notes
1 Dr. Schnell is a professor of geography and human environment at Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel, where Dr. Mishal is a professor of political science.