43
Views
60
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Remodelers Organize Cellular Chromatin by Counteracting Intrinsic Histone-DNA Sequence Preferences in a Class-Specific Manner

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 675-688 | Received 29 Sep 2011, Accepted 21 Nov 2011, Published online: 20 Mar 2023
 

Abstract

The nucleosome is the fundamental repeating unit of eukaryotic chromatin. Here, we assessed the interplay between DNA sequence and ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factors (remodelers) in the nucleosomal organization of a eukaryotic genome. We compared the genome-wide distribution of Drosophila NURD, (P)BAP, INO80, and ISWI, representing the four major remodeler families. Each remodeler has a unique set of genomic targets and generates distinct chromatin signatures. Remodeler loci have characteristic DNA sequence features, predicted to influence nucleosome formation. Strikingly, remodelers counteract DNA sequence-driven nucleosome distribution in two distinct ways. NURD, (P)BAP, and INO80 increase histone density at their target sequences, which intrinsically disfavor positioned nucleosome formation. In contrast, ISWI promotes open chromatin at sites that are propitious for precise nucleosome placement. Remodelers influence nucleosome organization genome-wide, reflecting their high genomic density and the propagation of nucleosome redistribution beyond remodeler binding sites. In transcriptionally silent early embryos, nucleosome organization correlates with intrinsic histone-DNA sequence preferences. Following differential expression of the genome, however, this relationship diminishes and eventually disappears. We conclude that the cellular nucleosome landscape is the result of the balance between DNA sequence-driven nucleosome placement and active nucleosome repositioning by remodelers and the transcription machinery.

View publisher note:
Articles of Significant Interest Selected from This Issue by the Editors

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06365-11.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Jurg Muller for the generous gift of anti-INO80 antibodies, Jesper Svejstrup for insightful discussions and suggestions, Robert-Jan Palstra for suggesting FAIRE, and Tokameh Mahmoudi and Rob Maeda for comments on the manuscript.

This work was supported by an EU grant (EUtracc; C.P.V.), an EMBO fellowship (Y.M.M.). A.A.T. thanks l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche for an award of a Chaire d'Excellence.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.