3
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Promoter-Proximal Poly(A) Sites Are Processed Efficiently, but the RNA Products Are Unstable in the Nucleus

&
Pages 2127-2135 | Received 23 Oct 1996, Accepted 09 Jan 1997, Published online: 29 Mar 2023
 

Abstract

The presence of two polyadenylation signals in the primary transcript of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) provirus leads to a requirement for regulation of 3′-end processing. To ensure that viral genome replication and gene expression occur, polyadenylation must occur at the poly(A) site transcribed from the 3′ long terminal repeat (LTR) but not the 5′ LTR. Models that have been proposed to explain this regulation include (i) inhibition of the 5′ site as a result of proximity to the promoter and (ii) enhancement of the 3′ site by U3 sequences that are transcribed upstream of only the 3′ poly(A) site. In previous studies designed to investigate these models, a reduction in the levels of steady-state RNA was observed when the HIV-1 poly(A) site was placed within 500 nucleotides of the cap site. Although these findings were interpreted to be the result of promoter proximity effects on 3′-end processing, in vitro studies demonstrated that the HIV-1 poly(A) site was equally functional in promoter-proximal and promoter-distal positions. These results led to the hypothesis that, in vivo, the poly(A) site is fully active at this close distance but the short transcripts produced are highly unstable in the nucleus and undergo rapid degradation, precluding their appearance as abundant mRNAs in the steady-state pool. To investigate the biogenesis of these short RNAs in vivo, experiments were performed to examine directly the nuclear processing rates of the HIV-1 poly(A) site in intact cells. By using recombinant adenoviruses as expression vectors, it is now demonstrated conclusively that the HIV-1 poly(A) site is indeed processed at equivalent levels independent of its distance from the promoter. Although transcripts containing the promoter-proximal poly(A) site are processed efficiently, most undergo degradation in the nucleus instead of nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.