Abstract
A re-examination of the lattice spacings and stabilities of the phases Mg2X (X=Si, Ge, Sn, Pb) suggests that, though electrochemical differences between the components are very important in controlling their stabilities, factors based on relative atomic sizes are also involved. For the most stable phase (Mg2Ge) the Mg–Ge distance approximates to the sum of the appropriate atomic radii for CN4 (Mg) and CN8 (Ge). Contraction or expansion of the Mg-X distance relative to the sum of the ionic radii lowers the stability. The AuY2 phases (Y = Al, Ga, In) conform to this behaviour.