![Sample our Humanities journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5939/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Humanities.jpg"})
Notes
1 The untimely death of my colleague and friend Ulrich Beck on New Year's Day — and so soon after that of Roy Bhaskar too — has given these events a further, if more personal, hue regarding a new stage in the emergence of a ‘new world’ to which both were so insightfully and whole-heartedly dedicated, to the very end, but which unfortunately they were unable to witness. This article is dedicated to their memory, with enormous gratitude.
2 Boltanski and Chiapello Citation2007.
3 Jessop and Sum Citation2006.
4 Tyfield Citation2012.
5 E.g. Willmott Citation2013; Parker Citation2013.
6 Flyvbjerg Citation1998.
7 Flyvbjerg et al. Citation2013. I note (with thanks to Mervyn Hartwig) that Bhaskar (Citation2008) thematizes ‘phronesis’ in Dialectic. This is not the place to compare these discussions. But the development of the term by Flyvbjerg and colleagues remains significantly different to Bhaskar's use of it — and in ways that again resonate with the difference between projects prioritizing building edifices of understanding as against projects focused primarily on strategic intervention, as discussed here.
8 Younge Citation2015.
11 Tyfield Citation2014.
12 Cf. Leach et al. Citation2010; Stirling 2008.
13 Flyvbjerg et al. Citation2013.
14 See e.g. Lanchester Citation2015 and Lanier Citation2013; and Kallis Citation2015 respectively.
15 Mirowski and Plehwe 2009.
16 Sayer Citation2011.
17 Groves 2013.
18 Grinbaum and Groves Citation2014.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
David Tyfield
David Tyfield is Reader in Environmental Innovation and Sociology, University of Lancaster, UK and Director of the International Research and Innovation Centre for the Environment (I-RICE), Guangzhou, China. His research focuses on the political economy of research and innovation, especially regarding low-carbon innovation in China.