The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: A randomized, controlled study
Richard T. Griffey, Nicole Shin, Solita Jones, Nnenna Aginam, Maureen Gross, Yonitte Kinsella, Jennifer A. Williams, Christopher R. Carpenter, Melody Goodman and Kimberly A. Kaphingst
DOI: 10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000001
Journal of Communication in Healthcare 8(1):10–21
Ethics approval for this article should have been listed as:
Ethics approval The protocol was reviewed by and received approval from the Washington University Institutional Review Board.
Building on research evidence to change health literacy policy and practice in England
Gillian Rowlands, Jonathan Berry, Joanne Protheroe and Rima E. Rudd
DOI: 10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000002
Journal of Communication in Healthcare 8(1):22–31
Ethics approval for this article should have been listed as:
Ethics approval The NHS research Ethics Committee was consulted. The project was classified as research but did not require ethics committee approval as it was not a clinical trial, did not involve patients recruited as a result of their use of the NHS, or involve any patient data.
Effect of combining attribute and goal framing within messages to change vaccination behavior
Rustam Haydarov and Joye C. Gordon
DOI: 10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000005
Journal of Communication in Healthcare 8(1):45–54
Ethics approval for this article should have been listed as:
Ethics approval Research conducted under authorization by IRB at Kansas State University.
A bilingual webnovela on the human papillomavirus: Will Latinas and health professionals use it?
Everly Macario and Ana Consuelo Matiella
DOI: 10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000004
Journal of Communication in Healthcare 8(1):55–66
Ethics approval for this article should have been listed as:
Ethics approval The protocols for the paper survey and focus groups of this study received IRB approval from Ethical and Independent Review Services, West Coast Division. Paper survey and focus group respondents (Latinas 18 to 26 years) signed an informed consent form before participating. To complete the confidential online survey, health professional respondents voluntarily and proactively opted-in to an invitation if they wanted to participate.
Reasons behind students' choices of primary care physicians: Finding ways to improve information about physicians online
Evan K. Perrault, Kami J. Silk, Daniel Totzkay, Sarah Sheff, Jisoo Ahn and Alice Hoffman
DOI: 10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000003
Journal of Communication in Healthcare 8(1):67–75
Ethics approval for this article should have been listed as:
Ethics approval This study received IRB approval from Michigan State University.
Exploring the role of communications in quality improvement: A case study of the 1000 Lives Campaign in NHS Wales
Andrew Cooper, Jonathon Gray, Alan Willson, Chris Lines, Joe McCannon and Karina McHardy
DOI: 10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000006
Journal of Communication in Healthcare 8(1):76–84
Ethics approval for this article should have been listed as:
Ethics approval The work described in this article reflected quality improvement activity and, as such, met organizational criteria for exemption from ethics committee review.