Classification of cochlear implant failures and explantation: the Melbourne experience, 1982–2006

Abstract

The definition and categorization of reasons for cochlear implant (CI) failure have recently been standardized following the publication of the European Consensus Statement on Cochlear Implant Failures and Explantation (ECSCIFE) (2005). The aim of this study was to review the Melbourne experience with cochlear implant failure and reimplantation, applying ECSCIFE guidelines for categorization and assessing hearing outcomes. A retrospective review was carried out of Melbourne CI clinic's records to identify all cases of implant failure and categorize them using ECSCIFE guidelines. Comparison was made of pre- and post-reimplantation hearing levels for those patients who had undergone ipsilateral reimplantation.

Between September 1982 and October 2006 the Melbourne clinic conducted 1164 CIs with 62 implant failures and explantation (5.3%). Reasons included device failure, (ECSCIFE category C, n = 35, 3.0%), medical complication (ECSCIFE category D, n = 19), characteristics decrement (ECSCIFE category B1, n = 2) and performance decrement (ECSCIFE category B2 n = 6). Forty-nine patients underwent ipsilateral explantation/reimplantation. Auditory performance with the second implant was comparable to the first implant levels.

The ECSCIFE provides an easy-to-use classification system for international reporting of CI device failures and explantations, however, detailed information of each implant failure may be lost in the final category, however. Cochlear explantation/reimplantation in Melbourne is a safe and effective procedure to restore patients to their pre-operative best auditory function levels. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:

• cochlear implant
• failure
• hearing
• results
• reimplanation