Conservative Medical Therapy of Infections Following Osteosynthesis: a Retrospective Analysis of a Six-Year Experience

Abstract

The conventional therapeutic approach to bone infection associated with osteosynthesis is based on the idea that microbial eradication is most readily achieved by removal of the foreign material together with adequate antimicrobial therapy. This strategy usually requires implantation of external fixation devices with additional discomfort to the patient. We report our experience with conservative medical and antimicrobial therapy without removal of the osteosynthesis until adequate bone callus deposition is documented by bone radiography scan. Twenty patients with infections associated with intramedullary nailing (9 patients), screws and plate (9 patients) or screws (2 patients) were treated between 1995 to 2000. Osteosynthesis implantation sites were tibia (7 patients), femur (6 patients), femur and tibia (1 patient), humerus (1 patient), others (5 patients). Diagnosis of infection was based on clinical-microbiological evidence and confirmed by 99Tc-labeled leukocyte scan studies. Offending pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus 17 cases, Staphylococcus aureus + Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, unknown, 1 case each. Most infections were initially treated with intravenous or intramuscular teicoplanin ± ciprofloxacin or rifampin followed by oral antimicrobial therapy usually with ciprofloxacin or minocycline plus rifampin. Mean duration of antimicrobial therapy was 27.7 weeks (range 12-64 weeks). All patients (100%) were cured, and none complained of side-effects requiring antibiotic therapy discontinuation. We conclude that conservative medical therapy is feasible for osteosynthesis-associated bone infection.