Ceftriaxone Prophylaxis in Abdominal, Cardiovascular, Thoracic, Orthopaedic, Neurosurgical and General Surgery: A Review of Practice 1996 - 2003

Abstract

The microbiology, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ceftriaxone prophylaxis were compared with those of alternative antimicrobial agents in abdominal, cardiovascular, thoracic, orthopaedic, neurosurgical and general surgical procedures published since 1996. Ceftriaxone was compared with cefazolin ± metronidazole, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime + metronidazole, penicillins, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, vancomycin and combined clindamycin/gentamicin. Ceftriaxone, used primarily as 'single shot prophylaxis', was at least as clinically effective if not better than the comparative single- and multipledose agents over the broad range of surgical procedures. Furthermore the overall cost of ceftriaxone prophylaxis has often been shown to be markedly less than comparators, despite the relatively high acquisition cost of ceftriaxone, when factors other than acquisition cost were considered. Advances in surgical techniques, the changes in bacterial ecology in hospitals, the spread of bacterial resistance and the substantial increase in the surgical population at risk suggest that third generation cephalosporins, particularly ceftriaxone, should be taken into consideration for surgical prophylaxis.

Keywords:

• Ceftriaxone
• surgical prophylaxis
• prophylaxis