THE IMPORTANCE OF SURFACE PROPERTIES AND PARTICLE SHAPE IN THE COMPACTION OF GRAPHITE AND MoS₂

Abstract

Adsorptive studies of the surfaces of graphite and MOS₂have shown that these consist of two distinct types of site. The sites on the basal-plane surface differ from those on the edge surface with respect to their relative affinities for different organic compounds. These findings led to the development of grinding techniques to produce graphite and MoS₂ powders possessing different ratios of basal-plane:edge-surface area.

Grinding graphite and MoS₂ in the presence of low-viscosity, volatile hydrocarbons produced very thin flake-like powders, consisting predominantly of basal-plane surface. These fine flakes showed a high affinity for long-chain n-paraffins and were therefore termed oleophilic solids. Grinding under reduced pressure also produced very fine powders, having, however, a more granular structure exhibiting a far lower ratio of basal-plane: edge-surface area. These were termed polar solids to distinguish them from the solids ground in liquid hydrocarbons.

The cold-forming properties of the various powders have been compared under uniaxial compaction. The conversion of synthetic and natural graphite powders to the oleophilic form resulted in marked improvements in both compact strength and modulus. Synthetic graphite converted to the polar form would not form a compact at cold-forming pressures up to 800 MN/m².

The cohesive properties of the oleophilic graphite powders were improved by heating to 900°C in hydrogen. Electrical-resistivity measurements showed that cold-formed oleophilic graphite compacts exhibited a marked anisotropy. The improved cold-forming properties of the powders are ascribed directly to improved cohesion via basal-plane site interactions, coupled with the facility of the flake powders to take up a preferential orientation during compaction in order fully to utilize the extensive basal-plane sites available for cohesion.

The differences between the oleophilic and polar forms of MoS₂ were less marked. It is believed that interparticle cohesive junctions are more readily formed via edge/edge interactions, and basal-plane junctions do not play as important a role in the cohesion of MoS₂ as in that of graphite.

The corrosion and abrasion of metal surfaces by graphite and MoS₂ have been examined. In all cases the powders converted to the oleophilic form showed reduced abrasive and corrosive characteristics when compared to similar powders converted to the polar form. These improvements are believed to result from the reduction of the possibilities of edge interactions with the metal surfaces.

Notes

* Manuscript received 5 June 1972. Contribution to a Symposium on ‘The Role of Surface Properties in Powder Metallurgy’ to be held in Eastbourne on 20 and 21 November 1972.