1,251
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Good publication practice guidelines for medical communications agencies: a MedComm perspective*

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 453-461 | Accepted 25 Nov 2008, Published online: 23 Dec 2008
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Physicians and other health care personnel rely on the peer-reviewed biomedical literature as a key source for making clinical decisions. Thus, ensuring that the nonclinical and clinical findings published in biomedical journals are reported accurately and clearly, without undue influence from commercial interests, is essential. Accordingly, beginning in the mid-1990s and continuing to the present, various organizations, including the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the American Medical Association, the Council of Science Editors, the American Medical Writers Association, and the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals, have published guidelines to strengthen and uphold ethical standards in biomedical communications.

Scope: A task force of staff members from the AXIS group of companies reviewed these and other guidelines to assess the need for a good publication practices (GPP) document specific to medical communications agencies. As this review demonstrated an unmet need, the task force was charged with developing GPP guidelines for the AXIS group of agencies in the United States.

Findings: Although such guidelines have been previously published on behalf of medical journal editors and publishers, medical writers, academic centers, and pharmaceutical companies, there has been no prior publication in the peer-reviewed literature of good publication practices for medical communications agencies, which face unique challenges in negotiating a balance among authors, sponsoring companies, and biomedical publishers.

Conclusion: This article presents and discusses these GPP guidelines. To our knowledge, this is the first publication of guidelines developed from the perspective of a medical communications agency.

* Presented in part at the International Publication Planning Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 26–27, 2008

* Presented in part at the International Publication Planning Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 26–27, 2008

Acknowledgments

Declaration of interest: All the authors are employees of AXIS Healthcare Communications agencies and developed this manuscript as part of their employment.

Notes

* Presented in part at the International Publication Planning Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 26–27, 2008

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.