Abstract
Purpose:
To evaluate the effects of timing and length of zoledronic acid (ZA) treatment on outcomes for patients with prostate cancer in clinical practice.
Materials and methods:
Patients with prostate cancer and first bone metastasis diagnosed from January 2003 to October 2006 were included. Patients were considered ‘untreated’ if no ZA was given, ‘early ZA-treated’ if ZA was initiated before skeletal complication (SC) occurrence or ‘late ZA-treated’ if one or more SC was documented before or at ZA initiation. Patients were classified with short (≤90 days), medium (91–180 days) or long (>180 days) treatment persistence. Assessments included follow-up duration (FUP) and risk of developing one or more SC.
Results:
Among eligible patients, 847 were untreated, 243 were early ZA-treated and 218 were late ZA-treated. For untreated versus early ZA-treated groups, median FUP was 263 versus 357 days (p < 0.0001), respectively, and time to first SC was 199 versus 273 days (p < 0.0001), respectively. ZA treatment was associated with significantly longer FUP and lower SC risk. The early ZA-treated group had significantly longer FUP versus the late ZA-treated group (median days, 357 vs. 299.5); the late ZA-treated group experienced significantly higher SC risk vs. the early ZA-treated group (odds ratio, 1.51). Compared with the long-persistence group, FUP was 56% and 40% shorter in the short and medium groups, respectively (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion:
Treatment with and early initiation of ZA for patients with prostate cancer and bone metastasis significantly prolonged time to and reduced risk of developing SC, while extending FUP.
Transparency
Declaration of funding
The study was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
Declaration of financial/other relationships
H.T.H. has disclosed that she is a paid consultant to Novartis, the marketer of zoledronic acid. S.-J.L. has disclosed that she is a consultant to Hind T. Hatoum & Company. M.R.S. and A.L. have disclosed that they act in an advisory capacity with Novartis. In addition, A.L. has disclosed that he has received laboratory research funding and provided expert testimony for Novartis. A.G. has disclosed that she is an employee of Novartis. The authors had full control of the findings and results presented, without any oversight or interference from the sponsor of the work.
The study was conducted using a licensed data set from PharMetrics to Novartis. PharMetrics data sets are structured to maintain patient anonymity and are in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). PharMetrics data sets do not contain patients' names; rather, patients are given unique identifying numbers to enable the conduct of research at patient level such as that reported in this manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The editorial assistance of ApotheCom in finalizing this manuscript is acknowledged.
Parts of these data were previously presented at the IX International Meeting on Cancer Induced Bone Disease, October 28–31, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia, USA.