206
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Cancer mortality according to lipid-lowering drugs and lipoproteins in a general population

, , , , &
Pages 1963-1971 | Accepted 16 Aug 2011, Published online: 07 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

Objective:

The beneficial effect of lipid-lowering drugs (LLD) on cardiovascular risk is established, but long term safety data remain scarce. Our aim was to assess 10-year risk of cancer mortality according to blood lipoprotein levels and LLD exposure, in a general population.

Methods:

Our analysis was based on the Third French MONICA survey on cardiovascular risk factors (1994–1997). Participants were randomly recruited from the general population of three French areas and were aged 35–64 years. Subjects with a history of cancer at baseline were excluded from the analysis. Vital status and cause of mortality were obtained 10 years after inclusion.

Results:

There were 3262 participants and 177 deaths were recorded over the 10-year period (78 due to a cancer). The sample comprised 64% of normolipidaemic, 25% of untreated dyslipidaemic and 11% of dyslipidaemic subjects treated with LLD (4% statins, 6% fibrates and 1% other hypolipidaemic drugs). After adjustment for centre, age, gender, smoking, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and mean corpuscular volume, the hazard ratios (HR) for cancer mortality in subjects with non-HDL cholesterol <3.5 mmol/L (135 mg/dL) and in those with HDL cholesterol <0.90 mmol/L (35 mg/dL) were 2.74 (95% confidence interval: 1.66–4.52, p < 0.001) and 2.83 (1.62–4.96, p < 0.001), respectively. The adjusted HR for cancer mortality was 0.31 (0.11–0.86, p = 0.025) in people on LLD compared to untreated subjects.

Conclusions:

In the present study, we confirm the significant association between low cholesterol and cancer mortality without finding any harmful signal regarding cancer risk associated with the use of LLD. The main limitations are remaining baseline differences between treated and untreated subjects (due to the observational design but minimized by the use of extensive adjustments and propensity score methods), and the lack of re-assessment of LLD exposure and cholesterol levels during follow-up, possibly leading to a misclassification bias.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

The study received research grants from the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), the Direction Générale de la Santé (DGS), the Institut Pasteur de Lille, the University Hospital of Lille, the Fonds d’intervention en Santé Publique, the Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale, ONIVINS, the Fondation de France, the CPAM of Selestat, the Fédération Française de Cardiologie, the Conseil Régional du Nord-Pas de Calais, Parke-Davis and Bayer pharmaceuticals, and CERIN.

Declaration of interest

E.B., V.B., J.D., D.A. and J.B.R. declare they have no conflict of interest. J.F. has received honoraria for educational activities from Astra Zeneca and Merck.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.