936
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The impact of blood glucose monitoring on depression and distress in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes

, , , , &
Pages 39-46 | Accepted 19 Aug 2011, Published online: 14 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

Objective:

To test whether a structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) protocol reduces depressive symptoms and diabetes distress.

Research design and methods:

A 12-month, cluster-randomised, clinical trial compared patients who received a collaborative, structured SMBG, physician/patient intervention with an active control. Studied were 483 insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients (experimental = 256, control = 227) ( ≥ 7.5% HbA1c) from 34 primary care practices (experimental = 21, control = 13). Experimental patients used a paper tool to record a 7-point SMBG profile on each of three consecutive days prior to their quarterly physician visit. Patients and physicians interpreted SMBG results to make medication and lifestyle changes.

Clinical trial registration:

NIH Trial Registry Number: NCT00674986.

Main outcome measures:

Depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire: PHQ-8), diabetes-related distress (Diabetes Distress Scale: DDS). HbA1c and SMBG frequency were assessed quarterly; data were analysed using Linear Mixed Models (LMM) for intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses.

Results:

ITT analyses showed significant improvement in depression and disease-related distress among experimental and control patients from baseline to 12 months (p < 0.01 in both cases) with no between-group differences. Experimental patients displayed significantly greater reductions in distress related to regimen adherence than controls. Also, experimental patients with elevated diabetes distress or depressive symptoms at baseline showed significantly greater reductions in distress and depressive symptoms than control patients at 12 months. The greater improvement in mood in the experimental than control group was independent of improvements in glycaemic control and changes in SMBG frequency.

Conclusions:

Using well standardised measures, collaborative, structured SMBG leads to reductions, not increases, in depressive symptoms and diabetes distress over time, for the large number of moderately depressed or distressed type 2 patients in poor glycaemic control. Changes in affective status are independent of improvements in glycaemic control and changes in SMBG frequency for these patients.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

Funding for the study was provided by Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

L.F., W.P., C.G.P. and Z.J. have disclosed that they have worked as consultants for Roche Diagnostics. L.A. and R.S.W. have disclosed that they are employed by Roche Diagnostics.

CMRO peer reviewers may have received honoraria for their review work. The peer reviewers on this manuscript have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Jaclyn Myers for her assistance in data analysis: intern, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Prior presentation: parts of this study were presented in poster form at the 69th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, New Orleans, LA, USA, 5–9 June 2009; 70th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Orlando, FL, USA, 25–29 June 2010; and 45th Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, Vienna, Austria, September 2009.

Notes

*Accu-Chek is a registered trade name of Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.