437
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hemataology: Original Article

Epoetin theta: efficacy and safety of subcutaneous administration in anemic pre-dialysis patients in the maintenance phase in comparison to epoetin beta

, , , , &
Pages 1101-1110 | Accepted 23 Apr 2012, Published online: 23 May 2012
 

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the efficacy and safety of epoetin theta and epoetin beta in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not yet receiving dialysis and previously on stable maintenance therapy with epoetin beta.

Methods:

In this multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority study, 288 patients were treated subcutaneously (s.c.) for 24 weeks with epoetin theta (n = 193) or epoetin beta (n = 95). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in hemoglobin (Hb) from a 2-week baseline period to end of treatment (12-week efficacy evaluation period [EEP], weeks 15–26). The non-inferiority limit was 1.0 g/dL (2-sided alpha = 0.05). Weekly doses of epoetin required to maintain Hb levels, dose changes, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were also evaluated.

Clinical trial registration:

EudraCT No. 2005-000142-37

Results:

Mean Hb values were comparable in both groups at baseline and during the 24-week treatment period. The estimated treatment difference between groups from baseline to EEP was 0.01 g/dL (95% confidence interval: −0.20, 0.22; p = 0.9207 (ANCOVA)), indicating that epoetin theta was non-inferior to epoetin beta. The weekly doses of epoetin theta or epoetin beta were nearly the same and the change from baseline to EEP in patients who switched to epoetin theta (36.6 to 30.0 IU/kgBW) was comparable to those continuing epoetin beta therapy (37.7 to 28.3 IU/kgBW). The profile and the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were comparable in both groups (17.1% epoetin theta; 14.7% epoetin beta). The most common ADR was hypertension. No patient developed anti-erythropoietin antibodies.

Conclusions:

Epoetin theta (s.c.) has efficacy comparable with epoetin beta (s.c.) in pre-dialysis patients with renal anemia based on Hb changes from baseline to end of treatment (non-inferiority). The safety profile was also comparable. Patients could be switched from maintenance treatment with epoetin beta to epoetin theta without relevant dose changes.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This clinical study and this article were sponsored by BioGeneriX AG, a member of the Teva Group.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

P.B., A.B., B.G. and D.Z. are employees of the Teva Group (including BioGeneriX AG and Merckle GmbH). P.B., A.B. and B.G own stock in the Teva group.

P.K. and E.A. received honoraria for the conduct of the clinical trial which is presented in the publication by BioGeneriX AG. These payments were made more than three years ago. The authors did not receive honoraria for the preparation of the article.

CMRO peer reviewers may have received honoraria for their review work. The peer reviewers on this manuscript have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participating investigators: Bosnia: Rasic, Senija; Mesic, Enisa; Bulgaria: Parvanova, Iovka; Nenchev, Nencho; Blagov, Blago; Monova, Daniela; Croatia: Jakic, Marko; Kes, Petar; Krpan, Dalibor; Racki, Sanjin; Sabljar-Matovinovic, Mirjana; Hungary: Ferenczi, Sandor; Kulcsar, Imre; Samik, Jozsef; Szegedi, Janos; Matyus, Janos; Nagy, Judit; Israel: Berar-Yanay, Noa; Bernheim, Jacques; Rapoport, Jayson; Weissgarten, Joshua; Yagil, Yoram; Poland: Grochowski, Janusz; Klatko, Wieslaw; Malecki, Robert; Manitius, Jacek; Nowicki, Michal; Rydzewski, Andrzej; Winter, Martyna; Sulowicz, Wladyslaw; Ksiažek, Andrzej; Romania: Bako, Gabriel; Rosu, Leonard; Mircescu, Gabriel; Serafinceanu, Cristian; Voiculescu, Mihai; Russia: Anashkin, Vitaliy; Ermolenko, Valentin; Essaian, Ashot; Tomilina, Natalia; Serbia: Dimkovic, Nada; Hrvacevic, Rajko; Turkey: Akcicek, Fehmi; Ataman, Rezzan; Camsari, Taner; Cirit, Mustafa; Usalan, Celalettin.

Notes

*Eporatio is a registered trade name of ratiopharm GmbH, Ulm, Germany

†Biopoin is a registered trade name of CT Arzneimittel, Berlin, Germany

‡NeoRecormon is a registered trade name of Roche Registration Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.