Abstract
In this article I expound several conceptual and pragmatic aspects of the least restrictive alternative (LRA) as alluded to by Fields and Ogles (2002). Specifically, the study and implementation of the LRA might be better served by attention to and appreciation of the variability and differential effectiveness of programs within as well as across programs with similar setting characteristics; a more thorough understanding of attitudes of parents, youths, and referral sources regarding placement and treatment; and an appreciation of the difference between effective treatment and least restrictive environment.