Abstract
Distance predicting functions may be used in a variety of applications for estimating travel distances between points. To evaluate the accuracy of a distance pre-dicting function and to determine its parameters, a goodness-of-fit criteria is employed. AD (Absolute Deviations), SD (Squared Deviations) and NAD (Normalized Absolute Deviations) are the three criteria that are mostly employed in practice. In the literature some assumptions have been made about the properties of each criterion. In this paper, we present statistical analyses performed to compare the three criteria from different perspectives. For this purpose, we employ the lkpθ-norm as the distance predicting function, and statistically compare the three criteria by using normalized absolute pre-diction error distributions in seventeen geographical regions. We find that there exist no significant differences between the criteria. However, since the criterion SD has desirable properties in terms of distance modelling procedures, we suggest its use in practice.