Abstract
Intellectually based expectancies are beliefs about the world that are subjectively perceived as true. Emotionally based expectancies are beliefs that have an "as if" quality to them. The two types of expectancies derive from different sources and are influenced by different variables. This study examined the relationship between these two types of expectancies and willingness to use aversive therapy. Forty-seven undergraduate subjects were first given a brief lecture on childhood autism and the treatment of self-injurious behavior by aversive therapy. Afterwards, they indicated on a brief questionnaire their intellectually and emotionally based expectancies about how effective aversive therapy would be. Finally, they indicated their willingness to use aversive therapy themselves with autistic children. The partial correlation of emotionally based expectancies with stated intentions was .48, that of intellectually based expectancies with stated intentions was .10. As predicted, the emotionally based expectancy correlation was significantly higher.