Abstract
The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship of child Abuse Potential (CAP) scores to parental responses given to child stimuli in analogue parenting situations. To assess the construct validity of the CAT, it was hypothesized that parent responses to analogue child situations would be judges as more controlling, punishing, aroused, and negative as CAP scores increased. Sixteen mothers from a local child abuse support group participated. The majority of mothers had not completed high school, had a mean income of $12,188, with small families containing a mean of 2.25children ranging in age from 6.9 years to 9.4 years. The results indicated that as CAP scores increased, parent responses were judges to be more controlling, more punishing, more highly aroused, and more rejecting of the child. No significant relationship between effect and CAP scores was present. Multiple regression analyses revealed that CAP scores and risk factors predicted parent verbal responses. CAP scores alone were more effective predictors of parent verbal behaviors than risk factors traditionally used to predict abusive parent responses. This study represented an advance because (1) an adult abusive sample was used and (2) independent ratings of parent verbal responses were obtained. Future research would benefit from the use of a larger, more heterogeneous sample and incorporation of direct observational data on parent-child interaction.