When Interviewing “Family”

Abstract

Lesbian and gay investigators who study lesbians and gay men may bring special knowledge and understanding to their research, which can facilitate data collection and analysis. However, inside investigators may mistakenly assume common cultural understandings with interviewees and fail to explore their respondents' unique perceptions. Furthermore, social desirability effects can bias respondent reports. Using illustrations from the author's research, this article describes the strengths and potential weaknesses of having an inside perspective when conducting qualitative research with gay men and lesbians. Maintaining self-awareness, peer debriefing, and prolonged engagement are offered as ways to maximize the advantages and avoid the potential biases of the insider position.

Key Words:

• Inside research
• social desirability
• qualitative research
• emic and etic
• gay men and lesbians