28
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Citation Inaccuracy in a Scientific Journal

A Continuing Issue

Pages 39-44 | Published online: 12 Oct 2008
 

Abstract

Three hundred and fourteen (20%) of the citations found in Environmental and Experimental Botany, volumes 41-42, 1999, were selected randomly and checked for accuracy. There were 232 errors identified. At least one error was found in 45.4% of the citations. While more than one-half of the citations with errors had only one error, one citation had seven and one had eight errors. There was an increase in the percentage of citations with errors and in the number of errors per citation compared to a 1990 study of the same journal.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.