29
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Discussion of Gay Patient-Gay Therapist

A Case Report of Stephen

Pages 45-51 | Received 01 Apr 1998, Accepted 01 Sep 1998, Published online: 20 Nov 2008
 

Abstract

This discussion of a case report focuses on the ubiquity of polarized thinking in formulating therapeutic concepts. Binary thinking afflicts the two sides of the essentialist-social constructivist debate. Both views avoid the fact that we can never really know where biology stops and culture begins. The classical view of transference is another type of binary thinking that diminishes the ambiguity that arises if one considers both the analyst and patient's contributions. It is argued, instead, that transference is not something projected onto a blank screen, but rather something that occurs between a therapist and patient based on subjective factors unique to each of them.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.