This article explores the way in which psychiatric evidence is used in disciplinary proceedings involving sex or drugs complaints against doctors in New South Wales. The evidence may be used not only to explain or justify aberrant behaviour, but also to predict the risk of re-offending. It is argued that predictions of risk based upon clinical judgment alone may be as flawed in disciplinary proceedings as they have been shown to be in other jurisdictions. The article draws upon Medical Tribunal cases, many of which are unreported, and from data taken from Annual Reports of the New South Wales Medical Board. It argues for more disciplined use of psychiatric evidence in disciplinary proceedings and a more proactive systemic approach to risk management.
Drugs, Sex and the Risk of Recidivism: Psychiatry in the Witness Box
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.