Significant political pressures apply to determinations for release of persons from involuntary psychiatric detention who suffer personality disorders rather than traditionally acknowledged psychiatric illnesses, and who have previously been responsible for significant criminal offences. Such debates are current in the United Kingdom; they generated considerable community controversy in Victoria, Australia, in relation to Garry David in the early 1990s; and they have been raised starkly by the Mental Health Review Tribunal, High Court and Court of Appeal decisions in New Zealand in relation to RCH. This article analyses the RCH controversy and explores the circumstances in New Zealand in which persons who are not mentally disordered can be involuntarily detained where they are clinically considered to pose a threat to the safety of the general community if released from civil commitment status.
Psychopathy, Dangerousness and Involuntary Detention in New Zealand: Fitness for Release from Compulsory Treatment Status
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.