47
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Critical appraisal of the JNC VI, WHO/ISH and BHS guidelines for essential hypertension

&
Pages 675-682 | Published online: 24 Feb 2005
 

Abstract

Three guidelines have been selected for this review: The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI), the 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) and the Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society (BHS). The guidelines are generally in accordance on the principles of drug prescribing. There is, however, a serious divergence of opinion between JNC VI and BHS, and WHO/ISH on the levels of blood pressure chosen for defining hypertension and the level to which blood pressure should be reduced. In defining hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), JNC VI and BHS recommendations for systolic blood pressure are 10 - 15 mmHg higher than WHO/ISH. There is even greater divergence of opinion between the guidelines on the recommended goals of treatment. Using conventional measurement WHO/ISH recommends lowering systolic blood pressure with treatment by 10 - 20/5 - 10 mmHg more than JNC VI and BHS depending on whether ‘normal’ or ‘optimal’ pressures are to be achieved. Using average daytime ABPM pressure, WHO/ISH recommends lowering the average daytime blood pressure with treatment by 10 - 30/5 - 10 mmHg more than JNC VI and BHS depending on whether ‘normal’ or ‘optimal’ blood pressures are chosen. These differing recommendations between JNC VI and BHS, and WHO/ISH cannot be reconciled and they are of such magnitude as to carry serious implications for clinical practice, not least among which is that acceptance of the WHO/ISH levels of ‘normality’ for blood pressure would result in some 45% of the population of all ages and nearly 60% of elderly people being classified as ‘hypertensive’.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.