Chemotherapy options for previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract

Introduction: Intensive chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline for untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has remained largely unchanged over the past 40 years, despite many large trials examining the choice and dosing of these agents.

Areas covered: We will review the major published clinical trials for untreated AML that have established the dosing choice and schedule for intensive therapy, as well as trials for patients not eligible for more intensive therapy. We will also discuss treatment considerations for subgroups of patients.

Expert opinion: While one or two cycles of anthracycline and cytarabine-based combination regimens remain the standard of care for younger and older patients with AML deemed fit to receive induction chemotherapy, controversy remains regarding the optimal selection and dosing schedule for anthracyclines. Low-intensity regimens, such as low-dose cytarabine and hypomethylating agents, can achieve a complete response even with adverse risk features, and can be used in a fit subset of older patients not eligible for clinical trial or transplant. Incorporation of new targeted agents, such as tyrosine kinase and small-molecule inhibitors, combined with better selection of drugs for unique patient cohorts, will likely be necessary to substantially improve outcomes in AML.

Keywords:

• acute myeloid leukemia
• cytarabine
• daunorubicin
• gemtuzumab ozogamicin
• hypomethylating agents
• idarubicin
• induction chemotherapy
• mitoxantrone

Declaration of interest

BC Medeiros has received research funding from Celgene. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Notes

This box summarizes key points contained in the article.