1,327
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Safety considerations when choosing the appropriate treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis

, MD & , MD

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that commonly affects young adults. The actual therapeutic armamentarium includes a large number of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), with 10 drugs already approved in Europe and 9 in the US, making the choice of therapy more complex. This requires an accurate evaluation of the benefits and risks provided by the different treatment options Citation[1].

In the July issue of Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, we can read a thorough review on the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety profile of fingolimod, the first approved oral multiple sclerosis therapy Citation[2]. Fingolimod is an effective treatment for relapsing MS and a suitable first- or second-line DMD for patients without cardiovascular risk factors Citation[3], although in Europe it is only approved as a second-line therapy. How does fingolimod compare to the other two available oral DMDs: teriflunomide and dimethyl-fumarate (DMF)? As no head-to-head studies comparing the oral DMDs are available, tolerability and safety emerge as important points in making a decision on therapy (). DMF is a twice-daily therapy, whereas fingolimod and teriflunomide are taken only once daily, which increases the likelihood of adherence.

Table 1. Adverse events of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying drugs.

Teriflunomide requires more frequent liver function tests (LFT) monitoring based on the concern for serious hepatotoxicity Citation[3]. Alopecia (hair thinning) is a cosmetic side effect of teriflunomide that is especially worrisome for many people. DMF has a satisfactory safety profile, although gastrointestinal side effects and flushing may affect the adherence to treatment. Four European cases of progressive multifocal leuckoencephalopathy (PML) were reported in association with the use of fumaric acid esters for the treatment of psoriasis, although there were confounding factors such as immunosuppression and prolonged leucopoenia Citation[4-6]. No case of PML has been reported with DMF. Cardiac events are the main concern with fingolimod Citation[7]. EMA and FDA guidelines require an electrocardiogram (ECG) prior to dosing and at 6 h after the first dose. In addition, continuous ECG monitoring during the 6 h observation period is recommended in the European Union. A recent study that enrolled 2417 patients confirmed that cardiac effects of fingolimod were transient and mostly asymptomatic; no patient developed a Mobitz type II second-degree or complete atrioventricular block Citation[8].

Although the overall risk of infection does not appear to be significantly increased, appropriate pretreatment screening and monitoring for infectious complications (especially herpesvirus and varicella) during fingolimod treatment are prudent Citation[2]. One study showed that the antiviral immune response under fingolimod treatment may be compromised Citation[9]. Patients with negative varicella antibody serology should be vaccinated, at least 1 month prior to initiation of fingolimod. Live attenuated virus vaccinations should be avoided during treatment with fingolimod.

Teratogenicity is an important issue in a disease that mainly affects women of childbearing age where unplanned pregnancies are not uncommon Citation[10]. The new oral medications for relapsing MS (fingolimod, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate) are all small molecules that readily diffuse across the placenta. A recent study of 66 pregnancies exposed to fingolimod revealed a congenital malformation rate of 14.6%, which exceeds the expected rate in the general population Citation[10,11]. Teratogenicity is an important safety consideration with teriflunomide (pregnancy category X), and it is recommended that women stop teriflunomide 2 years prior to conception due to its prolonged half-life unless they use an inconvenient elimination procedure with cholestyramine or activated powdered charcoal Citation[3].

Neurologists will need to have a detailed and structured discussion with patients before the selection of a DMD. This selection should be a shared decision that considers prognostic factors, concomitant medical illnesses and medications, lifestyle factors, potential risks, patient preferences and cost.

Declaration of interest

A Sempere has received fees for speaking or participation in advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Bayer, Schering Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and Teva. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Bibliography

  • Sorensen PS. New management algorithms in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2014;27:246-59
  • Ward MD, Jones DE, Goldman MD. Overview and safety of fingolimod hydrochloride use in patients with multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2014;13:989-98
  • Wingerchuk DM, Carter JL. Multiple sclerosis: current and emerging disease-modifying therapies and treatment strategies. Mayo Clin Proc 2014;89:225-40
  • Ermis U, Weis J, Schulz JB. PML in a patient treated with fumaric acid. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1657-8
  • Van Oosten BW, Killestein J, Barkhof F, et al. PML in a patient treated with dimethyl fumarate from a compounding pharmacy [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2013;368(20):1950]. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1658-9
  • Sweetser MT, Dawson KT, Bozic C. Manufacturer’s response to case reports of PML. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1659-61
  • Singer BA. Initiating oral fingolimod treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2013;6:269-75
  • Gold R, Comi G, Palace J, et al. Assessment of cardiac safety during fingolimod treatment initiation in a real-world relapsing multiple sclerosis population: a phase 3b, open-label study. J Neurol 2014;261:267-76
  • Ricklin ME, Lorscheider J, Waschbisch A, et al. T-cell response against varicella-zoster virus in fingolimod-treated MS patients. Neurology 2013;81:174-81
  • Langer-Gould AM. The pill times 2: what every woman with multiple sclerosis should know. Neurology 2014;82:654-5
  • Karlsson G, Francis G, Koren G, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in the clinical development program of fingolimod in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2014;82:674-80

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.