![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Considerable controversy is haunting the treatment of IPF ‘acute exacerbation’, its most devastating complication. The consensus coined term ‘acute exacerbation’ implies that on an unknown etiology disease such as IPF, an unknown etiology superimposed acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) represents the end-life event in a consistent proportion of patients and are treated by high dose steroids despite unproven benefit. Inversely, ALI/ARDS treatment recommendations are based on the provision of excellent supportive care plus an extensive search and appropriate treatment of the etiologic precipitant and all intensive care clinicians in the absence of an obvious etiology, considering that occult infection is the most probable and also the most treatable underlying condition, universally administer extensive spectrum antimicrobials. Viewing the persistent high mortality in IPF ‘acute exacerbations’ treated with steroids we strongly believe that a study comparing the two arms of the steroid and non-steroid approach is greatly awaited by scientists and owed to the patients.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending or royalties.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.