16
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Key Paper Evaluation

Predicting response: identifying molecular determinants of endocrine response and resistance in breast cancer

Pages 661-663 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Evaluation of: Fernandez-Cuesta L, Anaganti S, Hainaut P, Olivier M. p53 status influences response to tamoxifen but not to fulvestrant in breast cancer cell lines. Int. J. Cancer 128, 1813–1821 (2011).

Blocking estrogen activity or production through the use of anti-estrogens such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, respectively, has had a significant impact on improving the survival of breast cancer patients. However, innate or acquired resistance to these endocrine therapies remains a major clinical problem and a challenge to the successful treatment of this disease. A recent article explored the role of the tumor-suppressor gene TP53 in the response of breast cancer cell lines to tamoxifen and the pure anti-estrogen, fulvestrant. Mutations in TP53, which occur frequently in breast cancer like many other types of neoplasia, are already known to negatively influence prognosis, but here their role in the response to anti-estrogen treatment was evaluated. This study found that cells harboring p53 mutations were more resistant to the cytotoxic effects of 4-hydroxytamoxifen than their p53 wild-type counterparts. Furthermore, mutant p53 cells were actually stimulated by low concentrations of 4-hydroxytamoxifen, with evidence that this may be mediated through enhanced growth factor signaling. By contrast, p53 status did not affect the response to fulvestrant. This article further delineates the role of p53 as a determinant of the endocrine response.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.