93
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Improvements in CanMEDS competencies for medical students in an interdisciplinary and voluntary setting

&
Pages 499-505 | Published online: 12 Dec 2014
 

Abstract

Background

To practice medicine, doctors must master leadership, communication, team management, and collaboration, in addition to medical knowledge. The CanMEDS framework describes seven roles of a doctor, but the six nonmedical expert roles are de-emphasized in the academic medical curriculum. Innovative opportunities are needed for medical students to develop as participants in a world of interdisciplinary health care.

Methods

We founded a volunteer-based, interdisciplinary, student-run project called SUNDdag (HEALTHday) with 60 students from 12 different educational backgrounds. To evaluate the learning outcomes of the project, we conducted a cross-sectional study using an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire.

Results

Students joined the project due to it being health-promoting, volunteer-based, and interdisciplinary. The medical students reported a significant increase of skills in all seven roles except for “medical expert”. They reported an increased understanding of the non-health-related students’ skills.

Conclusion

In their future careers, medical students must collaborate with health care professionals in a team-based approach to patient care and with non-health-related professionals in administrative tasks. Interdisciplinary volunteer-based initiatives like SUNDdag are potential platforms for medical students to improve their CanMEDS competencies. We encourage students to initiate similar projects and we encourage faculties to support volunteer-based, interdisciplinary initiatives due to their favorable cost-benefit ratio.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the many volunteers in SUNDdag, from whom we have learned so much. Special thanks are also due to Austin Gagné for careful revision of the manuscript and to André Esbersen for editorial assistance.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work and alone are responsible for the content of this paper. No funding was raised to prepare this manuscript.