Abstract
Purpose
To determine the prognostic value of vimentin in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, specifically in relation to chemotherapy regimen and p53 mutant expression.
Patient and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the association of pre-treatment tumor expression of vimentin with 48-month overall survival (OS) of 72 all stages TNBC patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 in relation to chemotherapy regimen and expression of p53 mutant. Vimentin and p53 mutant expressions were examined using immunohistochemistry. Analysis was conducted on all patients collectively, then repeated on two cohorts divided according to the chemotherapy regimen. Sub-analysis was performed to determine the effect of p53 mutant expression on the prognostic value of vimentin.
Results
Vimentin was expressed in 43.1% of patients and was not associated with clinicopathologic characteristics. Vimentin was associated with improved 48-month OS in all patients in univariate analysis but not significant in multivariate analysis. When analyzed according to chemotherapy regimen, vimentin was independently associated with improved 48-month OS in patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy (80% vs 15.8%; HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05–0.58, p: 0.005). Other independent prognostic factors include T (HR: 6.18, 95% CI: 1.38–27.7, p: 0.017) and M (HR: 5.64, 95% CI: 1.2–26.33, p: 0.028). On subanalysis, vimentin was significantly associated with improved 48-month OS in patients expressing p53 mutant (69.2% vs 22.2%, p: 0.006) but was not significant in patients not expressing p53 mutant.
Conclusion
Vimentin expression was independently associated with improved 48-month OS in TNBC patients treated with non–platinum–based chemotherapy. Expression of p53 mutant significantly affected the prognostic value of vimentin.
Data Sharing Statement
The dataset analysed during the current study is available in Table S2.
Ethics Approval and Informed Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients involved, including permission to use clinical data and reexamination of tissue specimen. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical clearance was approved by the IRB Ethics Committee Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University/Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia with approval numbers KE/0286/03/2020 and KE/FK/0789/EC/2022.
Acknowledgments
The authors express gratitude to Sardjito General Hospital for providing the necessary assistance during data procurement for this publication.
Disclosure
Dr Ibnu Purwanto reports grants from Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University/Dr Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.