Vitamin D and orthodontics: an insight review

Abstract

Vitamin D is known as the oldest of all hormones. 7-Dehydrocholesterol is converted to previtamin D₃. It becomes a secosteroid when it is later converted to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (1,25(OH)₂D₃). A number of factors influence vitamin D₃ production, including skin pigmentation, the use of sunscreen lotions, season, latitude, and altitude. Vitamin D is important for bone metabolism and calcium hemostasis. Researchers have linked a deficiency in vitamin D levels to a number of systemic complications, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, immune deficiency, and infectious diseases. In orthodontics, laboratory studies have revealed some evidence that vitamin D enhances tooth movement and the stability of the tooth position. This review is an attempt to understand the role and systemic consequences of vitamin D deficiency and to examine its relevance to orthodontics.

Keywords:

• orthodontics
• tooth movements
• vitamin D
• vitamin deficiency

Historical and physiological perspectives

Vitamin D is known as the oldest of all hormones, and researchers have discovered the presence of this vitamin in the early phytoplankton species Emiliani huxleyi,¹ which produces vitamin D following sun exposure.¹ Other oceanic life forms utilize the high calcium content of E. huxleii for neuromuscular and metabolic activities. As vertebrates evolved in areas surrounding oceans, they retained their need for calcium, an essential element in the development of the skeleton and bone mineralization.¹ However, vertebrates needed to maintain vitamin D production for calcium absorption on land.¹

A human body needs approximately 3,000–5,000 IU of vitamin D each day.² A substantial proportion of the body’s daily requirement of vitamin D₃ comes from dietary intake, especially fatty fish, eggs, and fortified foods.^3,4 A recent cross-sectional study in the UK compared meat and fish eaters to vegetarians and vegans, revealing that vitamin D plasma levels were significantly higher among nonvegetarians compared to vegetarians.⁵

Hossein-nezhad and Holick⁶ showed that when people ingest vitamin D, the body incorporates it into chylomicrons. The body then releases it into the lymphatic system, and from there, it enters the venous blood.⁶ In the venous blood, vitamin D binds to vitamin D-binding proteins and lipoproteins, which are transported to the liver.⁶ Next, the liver processes vitamin D₂ and vitamin D₃ by 25-hydroxylation to make vitamin D metabolite, which clinicians and researchers use to determine patients’ vitamin D status.⁶ Then, in the kidneys, the vitamin D metabolite undergoes further hydroxylation to form the secosteroid hormone calciferol.^6,7 However, the main source of vitamin D is sunlight exposure. In another study, Hollik indicated that following sun exposure, the body converts vitamin D into previtamin D₃, lumisterol, and tachysterol via a process known as photoconversion, and that sun exposure improves isomerization to vitamin D₃ by a heat-induced membrane.⁴ Once vitamin D₃ is formed, vitamin D-binding proteins carry it to the dermal capillary bed.^7,8 During this process, the presence of tachysterol and lumisterol prevents vitamin D intoxication when individuals are exposed to solar ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation for prolonged durations.⁸

A number of factors have been shown by researchers to influence vitamin D₃ production, including skin pigmentation, age, clothing, the use of sunscreen lotions, time of the day, season, latitude, and altitude.^2,7–9 In winter, the wide zenith angle of the sun causes the solar UVB photons to travel longer through the ozone layer before reaching the earth.⁸ This may explain why above and below approximately 33° latitude, little, if any, vitamin D₃ is produced in the skin during winter.¹⁰ This may also explain why vitamin D₃ synthesis occurs only between approximately 10 in the morning and 3 in the afternoon in equatorial regions.¹⁰

Consequences of vitamin D deficiency

The function of vitamin D is to maintain serum calcium and phosphate concentrations, which are important for many physiological functions.¹⁰ These include normal mineralization of bone, muscle contraction, nerve conduction, and prevention of hypocalcemic tetany.^7,11 Researchers believe that 1,25(OH)₂D is essential for the body’s ability to elevate intestinal calcium absorption to 40% and intestinal phosphorus absorption to 80%, which are necessary for skeletal well-being in humans.⁷ Sniadecki argued that inadequate exposure to sunlight in childhood causes devastating bone deformities known as rickets.⁸ Exposing children to UVB radiation (290–315 nm) using a mercury arc lamp or sunlight was shown to be an effective treatment for this condition, and even prevented it from occurring.¹² In the 1930s, these findings led the US government to promote recommendations to parents regarding the benefits of sunlight exposure for bone health and the prevention of rickets.^12,13 At the same time, the governments of the United States and Europe attempted to fortify milk with 100 IU of vitamin D₂ per eight ounces to help with the widespread problem of rickets.¹² However, in the 1950s, the UK government was criticized for the spread of hypercalcemia due to milk fortification with vitamin D.¹⁵ This rise in the incidence of hypercalcemia led authorities to prohibit the fortification of milk and other dairy products with vitamin D.¹⁴

Researchers have linked vitamin D deficiency to muscle pain and muscle weakness.^7,15 In severe scenarios, researchers have found that muscle atrophy is related to secondary hyperparathyroidism, resulting in hypophosphatemia.^7,15,16 A recent meta-analysis of elderly people showed that taking supplemental and active forms of vitamin D daily reduced the incidence of falls by 19% and 23%, respectively.¹⁷ In addition, a number of investigators have shown that the incidence of certain types of cancer was higher among populations in higher latitudes, who experienced reduced sun exposure.^10,18 However, a double-blind, randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of high doses of vitamin D in improving the lower extremity activities and reducing the risks of falls showed that high doses of up to 60,000 IU neither significantly improved body functions nor reduced the incidence of falls despite adjusting the level of vitamin D in blood levels to 30 ng/mL.¹⁹

Previous studies have shed light on the connection between vitamin D deficiency and cardiovascular diseases.^20–22 In the prospective Intermountain Heart Collaborative Study, which had more than 40,000 participants, the researchers showed that participants with levels of 1,25(OH)₂D less than 15 ng/mL were more likely to suffer from hypertension, hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke compared with healthy controls.²³ In 2012, a meta-analysis evaluation through two prospective clinical trials revealed that a U-shaped relationship exists between vitamin D deficiency and the occurrence of cardiac problems. This confirms the increased susceptibility of individuals with low levels of vitamin D to the development of cardiovascular disease.²⁴

In addition, a meta-analysis of 8 cohort studies and 11 randomized control trials revealed a strong correlation between low levels of vitamin D and incidence of diabetes mellitus.²⁵ In fact, the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 52% higher among individuals with vitamin D levels above 25 ng/mL compared to those with levels below 14 ng/mL.²⁵

From another perspective, some studies have shown links between the level of vitamin D and the incidence of autoimmune diseases.^26–28 Multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and Crohn’s disease are more common in high latitudes and in areas with low sun exposure.^26–29 This relationship was further supported by a number of experiments demonstrating the role of vitamin D in regulating chemokine production, counteracting autoimmune inflammation, and encouraging the differentiation of immune cells.^26,27,29 Furthermore, researchers have shown that vitamin D helps to improve immunity against tuberculosis, influenza, and viral upper respiratory tract infections.³⁰

Numerous studies have evaluated the consequences of vitamin D deficiency. However, the data have been inconsistent, which might be due to variations in the diagnostic measures and cut-off values in defining a deficiency state.³¹

Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency

The levels of 25(OH)D₃ in the serum are routinely used to assess vitamin D levels in routine clinical practice.³¹ In the United States, the Institute of Medicine stated that adults require 20 ng/mL of vitamin D (to convert this, nmol/L= ng/mL multiplied by 2.496).³² There is no evidence to suggest that serum concentrations greater than 20 ng/mL of vitamin D are harmful for individuals.³² Researchers have suggested that the ideal level of vitamin D that should be maintained in individuals is between 40 and 60 ng/mL, and levels up to 100 ng/mL are likely harmless.¹⁹ However, caution has been advised when considering daily supplementation doses exceeding >10,000 IU/d (>250 mg/d).^33,34

The Endocrine Society considers children and adults with 25(OH)D levels of 20 ng/mL or less to be vitamin D deficient.¹⁹ Vitamin D insufficiency occurs when individuals have levels between 21 and 29 ng/mL, while vitamin D sufficiency is when individuals have levels of 30 ng/mL or greater.⁷

Generally, vitamin D levels are influenced by several factors, such as age, gender, diet, sunlight exposure, climate, and altitude.¹ In the UK, more than 40% of the population experiences vitamin D insufficiency.³⁵ Researchers have shown that this figure is usually much higher during winter and that the risk of vitamin D insufficiency increases with age, with adolescents being the most affected group among the young population. In one study, children and adolescents of Asian descent were less affected compared with age-matched participants of Caucasian origin.^1,8 This may be attributed to the increased skin melanin pigmentation among Caucasians.^1,8 The prevalence of low levels of vitamin D in adolescents in other parts of Europe is relatively high, ranging from 19% to 96%.^6,36 As mentioned earlier, many factors affect vitamin D levels in the body. In line with this, high levels of vitamin D are generally found in the populations of Norway and Sweden, and it is believed that this is due to the high intake of fish and cod liver oil.³ The relatively lower levels of vitamin D that are found in the populations of Spain, Italy, and Greece have been attributed to sun avoidance and air pollution.³

In the United States, 32% of the population has vitamin D levels of <20 ng/mL.^6,36 Those at risk of developing vitamin D deficiency include 70% of the Caucasian population and around 40% of the Hispanic/Mexican population.^6,36 In a national cohort study in Canada, vitamin D levels below 30 ng/mL were found in 57.5% of men and 60.7% of women. During winter, these levels are even higher, with 73.5% of men and 77.5% of women experiencing deficiency. In the United States, vitamin D deficiency is estimated to occur in 27% to 91% of pregnant women.^6,36,37 In other parts of the world, 45% to 100% of the population in Asia and 25% to 87% of the population in Australia have vitamin D deficiency.⁶ In New Zealand, children are at a high risk of developing vitamin D insufficiency due to their dietary intake, living at a low latitude, and their reduced skin melanin pigmentation.³⁸ Researchers thus anticipate that in New Zealand, vitamin D deficiency ranged from 25% to 59%.³⁸ In Australia, vitamin D levels were <30 ng/mL in 73% of adults.³

In the Middle East and Asia, vitamin D deficiency in children and adults is high, which is probably related to skin pigmentation and sun avoidance.^7,39 In a recent meta-analysis, researchers found evidence to suggest that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is as high as 81% in Saudi Arabia.⁴⁰ This was in line with recorded vitamin D levels in neighboring countries: 83% in Kuwait,⁴¹ 86.4% in Bahrain,⁴² 82.5% in the United Arab Emirates,⁴³ and 84.7% among adult females in Qatar.⁴⁴ Numerous other studies in Saudi Arabia showed that vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent across all demographic groups.^40,45–49 Specifically, a range of cut-offs between 25 and 50 nmol/L showed deficiency levels in 40% and 87% of the sample.^40,45–49

Vitamin D and orthodontics

Bone remodeling, following the application of orthodontic forces, includes resorptive and bone formation phases at the alveolar process.⁵⁰ A correlation has been shown between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and periodontitis and bone metabolism.⁵¹ Researchers have shown that vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and calcitonin regulate calcium and phosphorus levels.^50,52 In various studies, vitamin D stimulated bone resorption by inducing the differentiation of osteoclasts from their precursors and increasing the activity of existing osteoclasts.^53–55 One of the earlier attempts was made by Boyce and Weisbrode,⁵⁶ who evaluated the effects of calcium-rich diets and vitamin D metabolite injection on bone formation in rats. On day 1, osteoclasts in treated rats increased in comparison to controls. On days 3 and 4, the researchers observed a decrease in the number of osteoclasts. This sequela continued through days 6, 8, and 10. Meanwhile, in the same experimental period, there was a substantial increase in the number of osteoblasts in treated rats compared to controls. As anticipated, the calcium and phosphorus levels were increased. Boyce and Weisbrode⁵⁶ concluded that the experimental group experienced a net increase in bone formation (Table 1). Collins and Sinclair⁵⁷ demonstrated that intraligamentary injections of vitamin D metabolites cause an increase in the number of osteoclasts, and consequently in the rate of bone resorption, leading to an increase in the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction (Table 1). Later, in 2004, Kale et al⁵⁸ compared the effect of the administration of prostaglandin and 1,25-dihydroxy cholecalciferol (1,25 DHCC) on tooth movement. Both were found to increase the amount of tooth movement significantly when compared to controls. An increase in the number of Howship lacunae and capillaries on the pressure side was found in the experimental group. In addition, the number of osteoblasts on the external surface of the alveolar bone was increased following the administration of 1,25 DHCC in comparison to prostaglandin administration. Thus, the authors outlined the role of 1,25 DHCC in facilitating tooth movement through the regulation of bone deposition and the resorption processes (Table 1).⁵⁸

Table 1 Summaries of the main findings of the studies evaluating the effects of vitamin D and orthodontic movement

Study	Sample	Number		Experimental group method	Control group method	Osteoblasts in experimental group M(SD)	Osteoblasts in control group M(SD)	Notes
		Experimental	Control
Boyce and Weisbrode,^Citation57 1985	Female Sprague Dawley rats	46	26	135 ng (5 units) 1,25(OH) D, daily for a total of 1,2,3,4.6,8, or 10 days	Yes (IP dose of ethanol)	37.7 (3.81)	19.42 (5.06)
Kale et al,^59 2004	Male Sprague Dawley rats (6 weeks old)	37	5 (served as control at baseline)	Group 3: Dimethyl sulfoxide Group 4: 1,25-DHCC Group 5: Prostaglandin	Group 1: With no orthodontic force Group 2: With orthodontic force	Group 3: 11.33 (0.04) Group 4: 25.21 (0.03) Group 5: 20.82 0.08	Group 1: 0.77 (0.06) Group 2: 11.38 (0.09)	Tooth movement was significantly more among groups 4 and 5 (P<0.001)
Kawakami and Takano-Yamamoto,^Citation51 2004	Male Wistar rats (7 weeks old)	16	16	Group 1: Elastic band and injection of vichelon on the right side Group 2: Elastic band and injection of 1,25-DHCC on the left side	Group 3: No elastic band and injection of vichelon on the right side Group 4: No elastic band and injection of 1,25-DHCC on the left side	Group 1: No distal: 9.7 (3.7) Mesial: 6.2 (2.9) Group 2: Distal: 10.4 (4.6) Mesial: 13.2 (3.5)	Group 3: No distal:11.9 (5.3) Mesial:12.2 (5.4) Group 4: Distal:16.0 (3.0) Mesial:18.9 (3.7)
Collins and Sinclair,^Citation58 1988	Young cats	10	10	Orthodontic canine retraction with 1,25D injections	Orthodontic canine retraction with dimethyl sulfoxide injections	Osteoblasts not investigated Tooth movement = 3.25 (1.94) mm	Osteoblasts not investigated Tooth movement = 2.04 (1.27) mm	Difference in tooth movement was significant (P<0.05)

Abbreviations: 1, 25 DHCC, 1,25-dihydroxy cholecalciferol; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; IP, intraperitoneal; 1,25D, vitamin D metabolites.

Some investigators have suggested that in addition to faster teeth movement, localized administration of vitamin D enhances tooth position stability. Kawakami and Takano-Yamamoto⁵⁰ hypothesized that calcitriol may improve bone formation and periodontal tissue remodeling by increasing osteoblastic activity, which in turn would improve the stability of the teeth position after orthodontic movement. In this experiment, the authors divided a sample of 16 Wistar rats into experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, orthodontic elastics were inserted around the upper molars bilaterally. Every 3 days, calcitriol was injected locally and palatally to the upper molars on the right side. In the control group, calcitriol was injected locally but orthodontic elastic was not applied. The researchers found an increase in the mineral appositional rate on alveolar bone after they applied an orthodontic force and injected calcitriol in the submucosal palatal area of the rats, who were subjected to tooth movement. On day 7, researchers reported a significant increase in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts at the mesial side of the interradicular septum, and on day 14 an increase in osteoblasts only. In so doing, they showed that calcitriol has a potent effect on bone formation. The authors concluded that the use of calcitriol may promote the reestablishment of tissue supporting the teeth after orthodontic treatment (Table 1).⁵⁰ Similar findings were shown by Boyce and Weisbrode,⁵⁶ who found a temporary rise in the rate of bone resorption on the first 2 days followed by a progressive rise in bone formation after 14 days of calcitriol adminstration.⁵⁰

These laboratory studies suggest that orthodontic patients with vitamin D deficiency may experience a slower rate of tooth movement.^50,56,58 There was a substantial initial increase in osteoclastic activity followed by osteoblastic activity. These findings suggest that vitamin D and its metabolites may facilitate orthodontic treatment. Further evidence is needed to determine the safety of vitamin D treatment in orthodontic patients as well as the optimal amount and site of application for this purpose. In addition, given the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency worldwide,^{1–3,6,12,13} it is important that researchers explore the clinical application of vitamin D metabolites to enhance the rate of tooth movement during orthodontic therapy.

Conclusion

Approximately 3,000–5,000 IU of vitamin D is required daily for appropriate bone hemostaisis.² The body should maintain daily levels of vitamin D amounting to at least 30 ng/mL.^7,32 This requirement can be attained through sunlight exposure and intake of such dietary products as fatty fish, eggs, and fortified foods.³ A deficiency in vitamin D levels will lead to detrimental effects to the normal mineralization of bone, muscle contraction, and nerve conduction.^7,11

In orthodontics, vitamin D deficiency may lead to a slower rate of tooth movement, as evidenced by several laboratory-based investigations.^50,56,58 Further exploration is needed to determine the safety of vitamin D treatment in orthodontic patients as well as the optimal amount and site of application for this purpose. In addition, given the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency worldwide,^1–4,6–8 it is important for researchers to investigate the clinical application of these findings, including the potential use of vitamin D metabolites to enhance the rate of tooth movement during orthodontic therapy.

Disclosure

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.