Critical Appraisal of Filgotinib in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Current Evidence and Place in Therapy

Abstract

Background and Aims

Patients affected by moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) demand a challenging management. Small molecules, administrated as oral agents, have the ambition of overcoming the limitations of the biologic agents (ie, parenteral administration, rapidity of action, primary and secondary non-responsiveness). Beyond tofacitinib, a pan-Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor already approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe UC, novel more selective molecules like filgotinib are being currently evaluated in randomized clinical trials. We aimed to review the current evidence on filgotinib, a JAK-1 preferential inhibitor, in the treatment of UC and its place in therapy in the current scenario.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant studies: those investigating the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in the treatment of UC patients were included in this narrative review.

Results

The current preliminary data have shown that filgotinib is safe and effective in inducing clinical end endoscopic response in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe UC, also with high inflammatory burden at baseline. In the SELECTION trial, one case of pulmonary embolism occurred with filgotinib 200 mg induction, and three venous thrombosis cases were observed in the placebo maintenance/LTE; the incidence of herpes zoster was ≤1% in all UC treated patients. Filgotinib represents an appealing treatment option for its high selectiveness, route of administration and rapidity of action; cost-effectiveness studies and head-to-head trials are needed to better define its place in therapy.

Keywords:

• ulcerative colitis
• filgotinib
• Janus kinase inhibitors
• efficacy
• safety

Author Contributions

Guarantor of the article: Alessandro Armuzzi.

Author contributions: All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

A Armuzzi has received consulting and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arena, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli-Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Mylan, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Takeda, lecture and/or speaker bureau fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli-Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Takeda, Tigenix, and research grants from MSD, Pfizer, Takeda and Biogen. A Spinelli has served as a speaker, consultant or advisory board member for Ethicon, Takeda, Pfizer, Sofar, Oasis. A Repici received consultancy fee from Medtronic. A Dal Buono, R Gabbiadini, V Solitano, E Vespa and T Parigi declare no conflict of interests. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.