128
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Sex differences in stroke: a socioeconomic perspective

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1207-1212 | Published online: 06 Sep 2016
 

Abstract

Background

A number of studies have explored the issue of sex differences in stroke from biomedical perspective; however, there are still large gaps in the existing knowledge. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the differences in socioeconomic status and living conditions between men and women may explain the part of the sex differences in incidence and outcomes of stroke.

Methods

All stroke participants aged ≥60 years admitted in Vaseie Hospital in Sabzevar, Iran, from March 21, 2013, until March 20, 2014, were included in this study. Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to confirm stroke. A series of χ2 tests were performed and Statistical Program for Social Sciences, Version 21.0, was used to investigate the potential differences between older men and women in stroke incidence and outcomes.

Results

A total of 159 incident stroke cases were documented during 1 year. The annual rate of stroke was statistically significantly higher in elderly women than in elderly men (401 vs 357 per 100,000; P<0.001). Female elderly participants had significantly lower socioeconomic status, poorer living conditions, and higher lifetime history of depression, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus than their male counterparts.

Conclusion

The findings from this study showed that elderly women are more adversely affected by stroke in terms of incidence and outcomes of stroke than elderly men. The most noticeable result is that sex differences in socioeconomic status and living conditions may result in increased incidence of stroke and poorer outcomes in elderly women. Therefore, it is imperative to identify vulnerable elderly women and provide them appropriate treatment and services.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Iran. The authors would like to thank Associate Professor Dr Robab Sahaf and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions for the revision and improvement in this manuscript.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.