77
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Primary site surgery for elderly patients with distant metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: to do or not to do?

, &
Pages 1419-1432 | Published online: 06 Aug 2019
 

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of primary site surgery (PSS) on elderly patients (≥65 years) with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) distant metastasis.

Patients and methods

We reviewed Surveillance Epidemiology and the End Results database for elderly patients with distant pNET from 1973 to 2015. The variables and survival outcomes of patients with PSS were compared with that of patients with no PSS. After propensity score matching, the survival outcome was compared again between the two groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify variables associated with cancer-specific and overall survival. Four sub-groups were divided according to the age and differentiation: 1) age 65–74 years+ well or moderately differentiated; 2) age ≥75 years+ well or moderately differentiated; 3) age 65–74 years+ poorly differentiated or undifferentiated; and 4) age ≥75 years+ poorly differentiated or undifferentiated. Cancer-specific survival was compared between the patients with and without PSS in the above each group.

Results

A total of 210 elderly patients with distant pNET were finally confirmed. Of which, 148 patients did not undergo PSS, while 62 patients underwent PSS. Being female (p=0.049), locating on body/tail of pancreas (p=0.006), and well or moderately differentiated (p=0.032) were more likely received PSS. The patients underwent PSS had better survival outcomes both before and after propensity score matching. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis proves PSS and higher histological grade to be protective and risk factors. PSS may improve cancer specific survival in patients of group 1), and no improvement was observed in patients of the other three sub-groups.

Conclusion

Not all elderly patients with pNET distant metastasis could benefit from PSS. Patients aged 65–74 years with well or moderately differentiated may benefit from primary lesion surgery, but should be evaluated carefully. Prospective randomized controlled trials are worth performing.

Acknowledgment

We are deeply grateful to Ye-li Huang and Hui-yu Jin from the Nursing Department of The Sixth Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army General Hospital for their contributions to the revision of this article.

Ethical approval

This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. In addition, according to the guidelines of the government of the United States, data released through the SEER database does not require informed patient consent.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Supplementary materials

Table S1 Multivariate regression analysis of characteristics for cancer-specific survival in patients with age 65–74 years+ well or moderately differentiated

Table S2 Multivariate regression analysis of characteristics for cancer-specific survival in patients with age ≥75 years+ well or moderately differentiated

Table S3 Multivariate regression analysis of characteristics for cancer-specific survival in patients with age 65–74 years+ poorly differentiated or undifferentiated

Table S4 Multivariate regression analysis of characteristics for cancer-specific survival in patients with age ≥75 years+ poorly differentiated or undifferentiated