The Feasibility of Deriving the Electronic Frailty Index from Australian General Practice Records

Abstract

Purpose

Frailty is a prevalent condition in older adults. Identification of frailty using an electronic Frailty Index (eFI) has been successfully implemented across general practices in the United Kingdom. However, in Australia, the eFI remains understudied. Therefore, we aimed to (i) examine the feasibility of deriving an eFI from Australian general practice records and (ii) describe the prevalence of frailty as measured by the eFI and the prevalence with socioeconomic status and geographic remoteness.

Participants and Methods

This retrospective analysis included patients (≥70 years) attending any one of >700 general practices utilizing the Australian MedicineInsight data platform, 2017–2018. A 36-item eFI was derived using standard methodology, with frailty classified as mild (scores 0.13–0.24); moderate (0.25–0.36) or severe (≥0.37). Socioeconomic status (Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) index)) and geographic remoteness (Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGC) remoteness areas) were also examined.

Results

In total, 79,251 patients (56% female) were included, mean age 80.0 years (SD 6.5); 37.4% (95% CI 37.0–37.7) were mildly frail, 16.7% (95% CI 16.4–16.9) moderately frail, 4.8% (95% CI 4.7–5.0) severely frail. Median eFI score was 0.14 (IQR 0.08 to 0.22); maximum eFI score was 0.69. Across all age groups, moderate and severe frailty was significantly more prevalent in females (P < 0.001). Frailty severity increased with increasing age (P < 0.001) and was strongly associated with socioeconomic disadvantage (P < 0.001) but not with geographic remoteness.

Conclusion

Frailty was identifiable from routinely collected general practice data. Frailty was more prevalent in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, women and older patients and existed in all levels of remoteness. Routine implementation of an eFI could inform interventions to prevent or reduce frailty in all older adults, regardless of location.

Keywords:

• primary health care
• family practice
• frailty
• electronic health records
• geriatric assessment
• aged

Ethics Statement

Ethics approval was granted by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (#HC190384) and NPS MedicineWise Data Governance Committee (DG 2018-015).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr Robert Menzies, Professor Teng Liaw and Professor Roslyn Poulos for initial assistance with the study protocol. We are grateful to the general practices and general practitioners who participate in MedicineInsight and the patients whose de-identified data make this work possible.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the School of Population Health at the University of New South Wales. The funder had no role in the study design, conduct, reporting or decision to publish.