Cholesterol testing among men and women with disability: the role of morbidity

Abstract

Purpose

Despite more frequent use of health services by people living with disability, the quality of preventive care received may be suboptimal. In this retrospective cohort study, we used administrative data to examine the relationship between cholesterol testing and levels of disability and morbidity among women and men in Ontario, Canada.

Methods

We linked multiple provincial-level databases in this study. In stratified analyses for women and men, we used multivariable logistic regression to examine differences in cholesterol testing, and we tested for an interaction effect between disability and morbidity. In a secondary analysis, we tested for a three-way interaction between sex, disability, and morbidity on the entire cohort.

Results

There was an interaction between morbidity and disability for both women and men. Women and men with no chronic conditions appeared to be least likely to be up-to-date on cholesterol testing, and among this group, those with moderate disability were more likely to be up-to-date on cholesterol testing than those with no disability (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20–1.90 for women; AOR =1.16; 95% CI 1.00–1.34 for men). Among women and men who had one chronic condition, having severe disability put them at significant disadvantage versus those with no disability. Only 58.5% of men with no disability and no chronic conditions were up-to-date on cholesterol testing.

Conclusion

An intermediate level of health care need (reflected in this study as level of disability and level of morbidity) may provide a benefit for cholesterol testing, and conversely, health care needs that are too few or too great may negatively affect testing. Public health and practice-based interventions need to be explored to address these findings.

Keywords:

• primary care
• preventative care
• cholesterol testing
• disability
• morbidity

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by research grants from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MOHLTC) to the Health System Performance Research Network. This study was also supported by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), which is funded by an annual grant from the MOHLTC. The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES or the Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by CIHI. However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the author, and not necessarily those of CIHI. Dr Aisha Lofters is supported by a Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute Career Development Award in Cancer Prevention. Drs Lofters and Glazier are supported as Clinician Scientists in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto and at St Michael’s Hospital.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest in this work.