1,513
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Ethnic Differences in the Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Diagnoses in the UK: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Health Improvement Network Primary Care Database

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1081-1088 | Published online: 31 Dec 2019
 

Abstract

Aims/Hypothesis

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with high levels of disease burden, including increased mortality risk and significant long-term morbidity. The prevalence of diabetes differs substantially among ethnic groups. We examined the prevalence of type 2 diabetes diagnoses in the UK primary care setting.

Methods

We analysed data from 404,318 individuals in The Health Improvement Network database, aged 0–99 years and permanently registered with general practices in London. The association between ethnicity and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes diagnoses in 2013 was estimated using a logistic regression model, adjusting for effect of age group, sex, and social deprivation. A multiple imputation approach utilising population-level information about ethnicity from the UK census was used for imputing missing data.

Results

Compared with those of White ethnicity (5.04%, 95% CI 4.95 to 5.13), the crude percentage prevalence of type 2 diabetes was higher in the Asian (7.69%, 95% CI 7.46 to 7.92) and Black (5.58%, 95% CI 5.35 to 5.81) ethnic groups, while lower in the Mixed/Other group (3.42%, 95% CI 3.19 to 3.66). After adjusting for differences in age group, sex, and social deprivation, all minority ethnic groups were more likely to have a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes compared with the White group (OR Asian versus White 2.36, 95% CI 2.26 to 2.47; OR Black versus White 1.65, 95% CI 1.56 to 1.73; OR Mixed/Other versus White 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.27).

Conclusion

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was higher in the Asian and Black ethnic groups, compared with the White group. Accurate estimates of ethnic prevalence of type 2 diabetes based on large datasets are important for facilitating appropriate allocation of public health resources, and for allowing population-level research to be undertaken examining disease trajectories among minority ethnic groups, that might help reduce inequalities.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr Emre Basatemur (UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK) for sharing the list of Read codes related to ethnicity information in THIN database.

Disclosure

TMP was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research (project number 379), and awards to establish the Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, London, from the Medical Research Council, Arthritis Research UK, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Chief Scientist Office, Economic and Social Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, NIHR, National Institute for Social Care and Health Research, and Wellcome Trust (grant MR/K006584/1). TMP, JRC, and TPM were supported by the Medical Research Council (grant numbers MC_UU_12023/21 and MC_UU_12023/29). Not in relation to this project, JRC received personal fees from Pfizer, GSK, and grants from AstraZeneca, and IP and MS received funding from Novo Nordisk A/S.

The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.