217
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Therapeutic Options in Unresectable Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 6705-6719 | Published online: 25 Aug 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose

This review describes the current scientific evidence of therapeutic options in unresectable oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We searched MEDLINE (Via PubMed) to identify studies assessing treatments for unresectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. The methodological quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist tool. The evidence was organized and presented using tables and narrative synthesis.

Results

Thirty-three studies met the eligibility criteria. Most studies had an observational design. The sample size varied from 16 to 916 participants. The methodology quality of the included studies ranged from 2.5 to 10 using the JBI tool. Overall, the optimal treatment of patients with unresectable oral cancer is challenging, so there is a sprinkling of studies assessing a variety of therapeutic options, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy plus chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and gene therapy plus chemotherapy.

Conclusion

There is lacking evidence about the benefits of some therapeutic options for unresectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. Overall, these patients can be treated using a multimodal approach such as concurrent chemoradiotherapy or induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy, which have shown good clinical outcomes. However, other options could be considered depending on the assessment of risk/benefits, tumor extension, and patient values and preferences.

Data Sharing Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Author Contributions

Conceived the study: MM and LTA. Designed the study: MM, LTA and CLA. Analyzed the data: MM, LTA, CLA. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: MM and LTA. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: MM, LTA, CLA. All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest for this work.