Preoperative Blood Inflammatory Markers for the Differentiation of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma from Leiomyoma

Abstract

Purpose

Preoperative diagnosis of uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is challenging because the disease can mimic benign leiomyoma (LM). The objective of the present study was to investigate the role of preoperative clinical characteristics and hematologic parameters to differentiate uterine LMS and LM.

Methods

Preoperative clinical and laboratory variables were reviewed retrospectively in patients with LMS or LM, and the significances of intergroup differences were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine optimal cut-off values for each variable. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify variables predicting the presence of LMS.

Results

The preoperative clinical and laboratory variables of 336 patients with uterine tumor were analyzed. Seventy-nine patients had LMS and 257 had LM. A significant difference was observed between LMS and LM in terms of the median value of age at diagnosis, menopausal status, white blood cell (WBC) count, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (all P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that menopausal status (odds ratio [OR] = 3.40, P= 0.002), WBC count (OR = 2.09, P = 0.012), ANC (OR = 3.17, P < 0.001), CRP (OR = 21.74, P < 0.001), LDH (OR = 10.77, P < 0.001), and NLR (OR = 2.58, P = 0.001) predicted the presence of LMS.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that in older or postmenopausal patients, high WBC count, ANC, CRP, LDH, and NLR could be useful biomarkers for the differentiation of LMS and LM, which indicate that serum markers might be useful, cost-effective, and broadly available diagnostic markers for uterine LMS.

Keywords:

• C-reactive protein
• lactate dehydrogenase
• leiomyoma
• leiomyosarcoma
• neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by clinical research grant from Pusan National University Hospital in 2021.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.