MRI Differential Diagnosis and Guidance for Puncture Biopsy of Musculoskeletal Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma and Well Differentiated Liposarcoma

Abstract

Objective

The study aimed to investigate the significantly different imaging characteristics of musculoskeletal dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLP) and well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLP) on MRI, which in turn could guide puncture biopsy.

Materials and Methods

This study included 14 patients with DDLP and 16 patients with WDLP, all of whom were confirmed by histopathological examination. The MRI manifestations of these two pathologies were retrospectively reviewed and compared. Furthermore, a step-by-step procedure regarding preoperative puncture biopsy of fatty masses that are suspicious for WD/DD was designed.

Results

Fatty signals can be found in almost all WDs, with a greater proportion of non-fatty areas in DD compared to WD, and it is reasonable to consider WD more likely when the non-fatty areas of the tumor are <25% (p < 0.05), while it is reasonable to consider DD more likely when the non-fatty areas of the tumor are >50% (p < 0.05), and the MRI signals in DD are more complex, inhomogeneous (p < 0.01), usually showed significant enhancement (p < 0.01), and the margins of the tumor were usually indistinct (p < 0.01); and imaging features such as tumor size, vascularity, necrosis, and peritumoral edema did not serve as distinguishing features between the two (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

DD has a greater proportion of non-fatty components, with more complex and inhomogeneous MRI signals, and typically shows significant enhancement, with usually indistinct margins of the tumor, in which the inhomogeneous manifestations are associated with the histological components. The possibility of DD should be considered in fatty tumors with non-fatty areas > 25%, for which puncture biopsy is necessary, while simultaneous puncture of low, moderate, high-signal areas within the non-fatty area could improve the accuracy of preoperative puncture pathology.

Keywords:

• liposarcoma
• dedifferentiated liposarcoma
• well-differentiated liposarcoma
• magnetic resonance imaging
• puncture biopsy

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by the ethical review committee of the Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. In this retrospective study, all data remained anonymous, and the requirement for written informed consent from patients was waived. Written informed consent from participants was not required in accordance with local/national guidelines.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

The research was supported by Joint Project on Regional High-Incidence Diseases Research of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation under Grant No.2023JJA140355).