Abstract
Background
Diabetes is a leading threat to public health in India. A huge prevalence of type 1 diabetes among young patients is documented in literature; India is one of the countries with the highest number of new cases per year (10,900), of which 3–4 million face poverty along with diabetes.
Objective
The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of determinants of the disease burden among young patients with type 1 diabetes and their parents.
Methods
In June 2014, perceptions were collected from eleven young patients and five available parents using the critical incident technique.
Results
Disease burdens associated with the management of type 1 diabetes can vary significantly according to the different social and economic determinants facing each household. Determinants associated with good practices in the management of childhood type 1 diabetes included socioeconomic status, unawareness of health complications, and beliefs about nutrition. Coping strategies applied via lifestyle changes included monitoring glycemia and regular checkups by diabetologists. A general lack of awareness about type 1 diabetes in Indian society, stigmatization, and limited access and systematic barriers to the delivery of optimal health care were all perceived to be factors hindering the successful management of chronic type 1 diabetes by young patients and their parents.
Conclusion
Stigmatization, a lack of therapeutic adherence, and the financial strains placed on families, particularly on poor ones, are critical. More emphasis must be put on the prevention of acute and long-term complications and education.
Acknowledgments
We thank the children and their families for their participation in this study. The authors also thank the nursing students of the PSG College of Nursing, Coimbatore, India, and the Universities of Lausanne (A Godat and M Nikles) and Applied Sciences in Nursing La Source (C Orsino and N Conod) for their contribution to successful data collection. This study was funded by the Canton of Vaud and the University of Applied Nursing Sciences, La Source, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Author contributions
Study concept: HV, GM, EJA, and MM. Data acquisition: HV, GM, and MM. Data analysis and interpretation: HV, GM, EJA, and MM. Manuscript drafting: HV, GM, EJA, and MM. Statistical analysis: HV, GM, and MM. Fundraising: HV, GM, EJA, and MM. All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and critically revising the paper and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.