Abstract
Background
The prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) after the universal implementation of STRs is unknown in Taiwan.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of TDR in patients with HIV-1 infection, clarify the risk factors for pol resistance, and compare differences in HIV drug resistance before and after the implementation of STRs in Taiwan.
Methods
Adult patients infected with HIV-1 were enrolled in this study from 2013 to 2021. Mutations associated with drug resistance were identified using the 2019 International Antiviral Society-USA list of drug resistant mutations in HIV, and drug susceptibility was assessed according to the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database edition 9. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for pol resistance, and the differences in the prevalence of drug resistance from 2013–2016 to 2017–2021 were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test. General linear regression was used to analyze temporal changes in the annual proportion of TDR overall and by type of antiretroviral drugs.
Results
A total of 369 patients were included. The prevalence rate of pol resistance was 9.8% (36/369). The resistance rates to nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) were 3.3%, 6.9%, 0% and 1.8%, respectively. The patients with hepatitis C infection were more likely to have pol resistance (aHR 5.767, CI 1.232–26.991, p=0.026). The prevalence rate of pol resistance did not decrease after the implementation of STRs as first-line therapy in 2017 (11.2% vs 8.7%, aHR 1.329, CI 0.667–2.645, p=0.480), and no significant temporal changes were shown in the annual proportion of TDR overall or by type of antiretroviral drug.
Conclusion
Our findings showed a stable prevalence rate of transmitted drug resistance despite the implementation of STRs as the first-line therapy in June 2016.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.