Hypotensive response after water-walking and land-walking exercise sessions in healthy trained and untrained women

Abstract

Background:

The aim of this study was to compare post-exercise hypotension after acute sessions of water-walking and land-walking in healthy trained and untrained women.

Methods:

Twenty-three untrained (n = 12) and trained (n = 11) normotensive women performed two walking sessions in water and on land at 40% of peak VO₂ for 45 minutes. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were measured 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after the exercise sessions.

Results:

No differences were found between the groups for age and anthropometric parameters, but peak VO₂ for the trained women (45 ± 8 mL/kg/minute) was higher than for the untrained women (31 ± 3 mL/kg/minute). No differences were found between the groups with regard to systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure after water immersion. The heart rate in the trained group (62 ± 3 beats per minute [bpm]) was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in the untrained group (72 ± 4 bpm) on land, and after water immersion, this difference disappeared (58 ± 5 bpm in the trained women and 66 ± 5 bpm in the untrained women). Sixty minutes after water-walking, systolic blood pressure (108 ± 8 mmHg vs 97 ± 3 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (69 ± 5 mmHg vs 62 ± 5 mmHg), and mean arterial pressure (82 ± 6 mmHg vs 74 ± 4 mmHg) decreased significantly with rest in the untrained group, and no differences were found after land-walking. In the trained group, significant (P < 0.05) differences were found only for systolic blood pressure (110 ± 9 mmHg vs 100 ± 9 mmHg) after 60 minutes of water-walking; decreases in systolic blood pressure were found after 45 minutes (99 ± 7 mmHg) and 60 minutes (99 ± 6 mmHg) compared with rest (107 ± 5 mmHg) after land-walking.

Conclusion:

Single water-walking and land-walking sessions induced important hypotension following exercise. Additionally, walking performed in chest-deep water has a better effect on exercise-induced hypotension in untrained healthy women than walking at a similar intensity on land.

Keywords:

• water-based exercise
• post-exercise hypotension
• blood pressure
• cardiovascular response
• normotensive women

Introduction

Physical activity is currently considered to be a nonpharmacological strategy for treatment of hypertension.¹ Among the effects of physical activity on the cardiovascular system, post-exercise hypotension (PEH) has been studied in hypertensive subjects with clinically relevant implications.^2,3

Aerobic exercise is recommended in most guidelines for hypertension control.^1,4 At present, water-based exercise is considered a popular aerobic activity,⁵ and numerous benefits are found, including decreased contact force and stress on weight-bearing joints, bones, and muscles, which reduces pain.⁶ These activities have been used in rehabilitative, therapeutic, and general conditioning programs, and are thought to be particularly useful for people with lower extremity injuries. For this reason, water-based exercises are considered to be suitable for individuals with weight-bearing problems and those of middle or advanced age.^7,8

Several physiological adaptations occur with water-based exercise, including a greater reduction in sympathetic drive, reduced catecholamine release, reduction of peripheral vascular resistance, and suppression of the vasopressin and renin-angiotensin systems than those observed with land exercise.^9–13 However, few studies have investigated the PEH response after water-based exercise.¹⁴ Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of water-walking on the PEH response in healthy trained and untrained women. Additionally, the effectiveness of an acute water-walking session was compared with that of an acute session of land-walking.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Twenty-three normotensive women without any physical limitations participated in this study. The women were allocated to one of two groups, ie, trained (n = 11) or untrained (n = 12) in water-based exercise. To be included in the trained group, women had to have participated for a minimum of 12 months in a regular water-based exercise program and those who had not participated in any exercise program before the study were assigned to the untrained group. All procedures followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm). This research was approved by the ethics committee of the Federal University of São Paulo. Exclusion criteria were recent hospitalization, symptomatic cardiorespiratory disease or cardiac alterations, hypertension or metabolic syndrome, severe renal or hepatic disease, cognitive impairment, a progressive or debilitating condition, marked obesity with inability to exercise, and any other medical contraindication to physical exercise.

Acute exercise session

Initially the subjects performed an incremental treadmill exhaustion test according to Balke’s protocol.¹⁵ The VO₂ values were recorded every 30 seconds using a gas analyzer (Quinton QMC 000350, Bothell, WA). The parameters used to determine peak VO₂ were respiratory exchange ratio >1.1 and maximum heart rate less than 10 beats per minute (bpm) of the age-predicted value. Heart rate was monitored every 30 seconds during the test by 12-lead electrocardiography (Quinton, Q710 Bothell, WA). Seven days after peak VO₂ determination, the subjects returned to the laboratory to perform the first walking session at 40% of peak VO₂ for 45 minutes. Following the test, no differences were found between heart rate corresponding to exercise intensity for the different forms of exercise on land-walking (untrained 120 ± 4 bpm, trained 115 ± 3 bpm) and on water-walking (untrained 121 ± 3 bpm, trained 117 ± 4 bpm).

Subjects who started with land-walking returned to the laboratory seven days later to perform water-walking. Before the exercise session, subjects remained seated for 20 minutes, during which blood pressure and heart rate were measured. After the exercise session, blood pressure and heart rate were remeasured at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes with subjects seated. Due to the physical properties of water, whereby resistance increases with velocity of movement, exercise intensity was monitored in all participants by heart rate (Accurex Plus, Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland) and subjective level of exertion on the Borg scale as confirmed in previous publications.^16–18 The same parameters were measured for land-walking exercise. The subjects were instructed to move through the full range of motion, without exceeding the exercise intensity stipulated.

Body composition

Biometric parameters were assessed according to the method described by Serra et al.¹⁹ Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a Cardiomed stadiometer. Body mass was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a Filizola scale (Personal Line 150 model). Body mass index (kg/m²) was calculated as body mass/height × height.

Blood pressure and heart rate

Subjects arrived in the laboratory at around 8–10 am and remained resting in a seated position for 20 minutes before initiation of exercise. Blood pressure was measured by auscultation (sphygmomanometer and stethoscope, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) as described elsewhere,²⁰ and the average of three measurements was considered representative for each subject. The subjects did not perform any physical activity for at least 24 hours before evaluation and did not take any caffeine or alcohol. All measurements were performed by one experienced researcher.

To assess the influence of water immersion on heart rate and blood pressure, all subjects were immersed in water and then remained standing for 60 minutes (control session). Measurements were performed every 5 minutes and the water temperature was adjusted to 30°C ± 1°C. Water depth was maintained at the xiphoid process for the study period.

All measurements were performed in a seating position before (baseline) and 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after both types of exercise session. Heart rate was continuously measured and recorded on a beat-by-beat basis using Polar Electro equipment during exercise and following exercise bouts.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as means ± standard deviation and were analyzed using SigmaStat 3.5 (www.Systat.com). The Shapiro–Wilk test was applied to evaluate normal distribution of the data, and Levene’s test was used to verify the homogeneity of variances. Student’s t-test was used as appropriate and repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the degree of difference in blood pressure between resting values and 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes following exercise. Newman–Keuls post hoc test was used to determine differences. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was accepted as being statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups for age, height, and weight (Table 1). However, the maximum aerobic power of the trained group was significantly higher than that of the untrained group (Table 1). The influence of the exercise environment on blood pressure levels is shown in Figure 1. No significant differences were found for systolic blood pressure between exercise performed on land and on water immersion (land, 108 ± 8 mmHg; water, 102 ± 3 mmHg; P > 0.05), diastolic blood pressure (land, 69 ± 6 mmHg; water, 60 ± 3 mmHg; P > 0.05) and mean arterial pressure (land, 82 ± 6 mmHg; water, 74 ± 3 mmHg; P > 0.05) in the untrained group. Similar results were found in the trained group, for which blood pressure levels were not statistically different according to training environment. No differences was found in heart rate between land-walking and water-walking for untrained women (73 ± 4 bpm and 66 ± 3 bpm, respectively) or trained women (62 ± 24 bpm and 58 ± 5 bpm), but there was differences between the groups for land parameters, as shown in Figure 1D.

Figure 1 Values expressed as means ± standard deviation. Panel (A) systolic blood pressure, (B) diastolic blood pressure, (C) mean arterial pressure, and (D) heart rate.

Note: *Significantly different (P < 0.05) vs untrained on land.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of patients

	Untrained	Trained	P value
Age (years)	33 ± 7	32 ± 6	>0.05
Body weight (kg)	57 ± 16	63 ± 8	>0.05
Height (cm)	162 ± 11	167 ± 13	>0.05
Body mass index (kg/m^2)	22 ± 7	23 ± 3	>0.05
VO2 max (mL/kg/min)	31 ± 3	45 ± 8	<0.01

Note: Values expressed as means ± standard deviation.

Abbreviation: VO_{2 max}, maximum aerobic power.

Figure 2 shows the systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure results in untrained and trained women performing water-walking and land-walking at 40% of peak VO₂. There was a decrease (P < 0.05) in systolic blood pressure after 30 (99 ± 4 mmHg), 45 (98 ± 2 mmHg), and 60 (97 ± 3 mmHg) minutes compared with resting conditions (108 ± 8 mmHg). There was no significant decrease in systolic blood pressure after land-walking (Figures 1A and B). When trained women executed water-walking, systolic blood pressure decreased (P < 0.05) after 15 (102 ± 6 mmHg), 30 (101 ± 7 mmHg), 45 (101 ± 6 mmHg), and 60 minutes (100 ± 9 mmHg) compared with resting conditions (111 ± 9 mmHg). On the other hand, systolic blood pressure decreased (P < 0.05) only after 45 (99 ± 7 mmHg) and 60 (97 ± 6 mmHg) minutes compared with rest (107 ± 5 mmHg) after land-walking. The untrained group showed a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in diastolic blood pressure at 45 (64 ± 6 mmHg) and 60 (62 ± 5.0 mmHg) minutes after water-walking as compared with rest (69 ± 5 mmHg). No modifications in diastolic blood pressure were observed after land-walking. In the trained group, diastolic blood pressure showed a decrease (P < 0.05) only until 60 minutes after land-walking (63 ± 4 mmHg) compared with rest (67 ± 6 mmHg). Mean arterial pressure decreased (P < 0.05) only at 60 minutes (82 ± 6 mmHg at rest vs 74 ± 4 mmHg) after water-walking in untrained women.

Figure 2 Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation of systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure in untrained and trained women measured after an acute session of exercise in water (○) and on land (•).

Notes: *Significantly different (P < 0.05) vs rest in water; ^#significantly different (P < 0.05) vs rest on land.

Discussion

Utilization of several aerobic exercise modalities, such as walking, running, cycling, and swimming, as a nonpharmacological therapy for hypertension is well documented.^21–23 However, the effects of water-based exercise are not completely understood. To our knowledge, there is no study showing the hypotensive effect of water-walking vs land-walking in normotensive trained and untrained individuals.

Assuming that PEH is a consequence of several changes that occur during exercise, and that during water-walking, the cardiovascular adjustments are different from those occurring during land-walking, the objective of this study was to evaluate the PEH in response to different exercise environments. Thus, we demonstrated that blood pressure was strongly affected by the water-walking exercise in untrained and trained normotensive individuals. This finding is in agreement with previous studies obtained for land-walking exercise.^24–29 The absence of blood pressure modifications in the control water immersion states indicates that the decrease in blood pressure was induced by exercise.

The main finding in this study was the anticipated decrease in blood pressure in untrained women after a water exercise session compared with land exercise. Our results are in accordance with previous studies, which found a decrease of 6–10 mmHg in systolic blood pressure and 2–5 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure in normotensive untrained individuals performing aerobic exercise on land.^28,30–32 These results obtained in a water-walking condition could be related to greater reduction in sympathetic activity, reduced catecholamine release, reduction of peripheral vascular resistance, and suppression of the vasopressin and renin-angiotensin systems than that seen for land-based exercise.^10,34,35 Unfortunately, in the present study, these parameters were not measured and this is a limitation of our research.

The present study extends the clinical relevance of PEH in a water environment, indicating that an aquatic environment may be used as a relevant tool for physical exercise in hypertensive individuals. Thus, water-walking exercise as a nonpharmacological therapy can contribute to control of blood pressure, prevention of hypertension, and recovery of cardiovascular function. The exercise performed in a head-out water-immersion condition was capable of producing PEH. These data are in agreement with a study by Meyer and Bücking,¹³ who reported that immersion up to the iliac crest was not enough to produce hemodynamic changes. It is possible that the initial depth required to promote significant changes in PEH may be the height of the xiphoid process. This phenomenon had been observed in previous research by our group,¹⁴ in which aerobic exercise on land and in water (immersion up to the waist) performed by hypertensive individuals at 50% of peak VO₂ was not capable of inducing significant hemodynamic changes. Furthermore, the absence of PEH on land-walking exercise in sedentary women reinforces the idea that the environment can be a determining factor for hypotension.

In trained women, PEH was more evident at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after water-walking. For land exercise, the drop in systolic blood pressure occurred only after 45 and 60 minutes. Additionally, there was no difference between trained and sedentary individuals. These results are in accordance with other studies, in which the authors found no differences in the magnitude of hypotension between trained and sedentary individuals.^34,36 Some studies have shown that aerobic exercise at a higher intensity produces greater^3,27,34 and more lasting^3,27 PEH as compared with moderate intensity aerobic exercise. In fact, we can also relate this result to the low intensity of aerobic exercise (40% of peak VO₂), that may not have been enough to induce a significant drop in blood pressure in the trained group.

Some limitations to our research should be mentioned. The mechanisms of hypotension were not investigated in the present study, but previous studies have shown that hypotension can be provoked by a reduction in peripheral vascular resistance,³⁶ sympathetic activity,³⁷ and a lower systolic volume,³⁷ and that these physiological responses can be amplified by exercise performed in water.^11,14 However, it is important to mention that more research involving hypertensive subjects of both gender are necessary to confirm this hypothesis. According to Halliwill,³⁸ there is a sustained vasodilatation after exercise induced by neural and vascular components, which is associated with a decrease in the vasoconstrictor effect of catecholamines. The neural component is related to a decrease in the sympathetic activity of the muscle (that would involve the readjustment of the baroreflex). The vascular component is associated with an attenuation of sensitivity to sympathetic stimuli (with a lower vascular response to activation of alpha-adrenergic receptors), as well as by the effect of vasodilator substances.

Finally, our data have a clinically relevant role, in light of the comments by Forjaz et al³ that blood pressure values at 24 hours after an exercise session remained at lower levels than the pressure values of 24 hours after a day without exercise. In summary, exercise performed in a water environment can be an efficient and safe therapeutic approach to controlling blood pressure. Furthermore, numerous benefits could be found for water-based exercise (decreased contact force and stress on weight-bearing joints, bones, and muscles, which reduces pain), and obese hypertensive individuals may enjoy this activity safely.

In the current study, group comparisons (eg, untrained and trained women) were not made, so differences between water-based and land-based exercise in terms of effect on PEH were not tested according to training status. Clearly, this is a logical next step in trying to understand how differences in PEH occur as well as assess this response in hypertensive subjects.

The present study demonstrated that acute sessions of water-walking and land-walking induced important PEH. Additionally, walking performed in chest-deep water was more effective than walking at a similar intensity on land in inducing PEH in untrained healthy women.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.