Survival Analysis of Hepatosplenic T Cell Lymphoma: A Population-Based Study Using SEER

Abstract

Purpose

Hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare tumor that lacks data to guide management decisions. To shed light on the nature and therapy of the entity, we conducted this study.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with HSTCL between 1975 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to analyze the clinical characteristics and survival outcome compared with PTCL-NOS and ALK+ ALCL.

Results

A total of 123 HSTCLs were included in the analysis. Most patients were aged ≤60 years (81.3%) and had a male predominance (69.1%). Organs with lymphoma infiltration of HSTCL were more common in the spleen (98.4%). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the entire HSTCL cohort were 56.9% (95% CI, 47.5–66.3%), 37.6% (95% CI, 28.0–47.2%), and 31.6.0% (95% CI, 22.2–41.0%), respectively. The overall survival (OS) of HSTCL patients was similar to that of PTCL-NOS patients (P = 0.128) but worse than that of patients with ALK+ ALCL (P < 0.001). The disease-specific survival (DSS) of HSTCL patients was worse than that of PTCL-NOS and ALK+ ALCL patients (P < 0.05). The same tendency was found in the matched data set. Cox regression analyses indicated that the use of chemotherapy combined with topical treatment may improve the survival of patients with HSTCL.

Conclusion

A higher proportion of young patients and a strong male predominance were found in HSTCL. Chemotherapy combined with topical treatment may be an optional regimen. Further studies are needed to intensify efforts in dealing with this rare but unfavorable disease.

Keywords:

• hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma
• survival
• SEER
• treatment

Introduction

Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare and aggressive type of extranodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma. It was first described using the designation erythrophagocytic T γ lymphoma in 1981 by Kadin et al, and they reported two adults presenting with hepatosplenomegaly and minimal lymphadenopathy.¹ Subsequently, the term hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma was first used in 1990 in two malignant lymphoma patients with hepatosplenic disease and by the sinusal/sinusoidal tropism and the gamma delta phenotype of the malignant cells.² The alpha-beta T-cell receptor phenotype is now considered an immunophenotypic variant of the same disease entity in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification.³

HSTCL represents 1.4% of T cell lymphoma diagnosed worldwide.⁴ A higher incidence rate was reported in the United States population according to the T Cell Project, which accounted for 2% of T cell lymphomas.⁵ The malignant cells of HSTCL showed the presence of small- to medium-sized mature T cells, which typically involved the sinusoids of the spleen and liver.⁶ The sinusoids of bone marrow were also reported to be involved in most patients at the time of diagnosis.⁷ As a consequence, patients commonly present with splenomegaly and/or hepatomegaly. Cytopenias often could be observed. HSTCL mainly affected young adults and had a strong male predominance. It has a rapidly progressive course and no standard therapy for treatment. The efficacy of standard anthracycline-containing chemotherapy may have variable responses with high relapse rates and short median survival in most cases.^5,8,9 A more intensive regimen was reported to have a better complete response.⁸ Moreover, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was found to be potentially curative.¹⁰ Splenectomy may sometimes be a useful therapeutic option.¹¹ The role of radiotherapy still remains unclear. The reported median overall survival (OS) was 6–28.3 months, regardless of the treatment modalities.^5,7,12 There are also case reports demonstrating HSCTL patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, which is equally as severe and associated with a rapid clinical course.^7,11,13

However, most of these data are obtained from case reports or retrospective studies with very small samples in a single institution.

Due to the limited data and the absence of large clinical studies regarding the clinical course of HSTCL, we identified the clinical characteristics, OS and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients with HSTCL using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Patients and Methods

Data were extracted from the SEER 18 (1975–2016) registry database of the US National Cancer Institute using SEER*STAT software version 8.3.8 (https://seer.cancer.gov/, accession number: 15756-Nov2019). Patients with histologically confirmed malignant hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), and ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK+ ALCL), were identified using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology edition 3 histology codes 9716/3, 9702/3 and 9614/3, respectively. In addition, hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma was also identified using organs or systems with lymphoma infiltration and morphology labeling (C22.0 liver and C42.2 spleen).

Hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma cases were matched 1:1 with PTCL-NOS, ALK+ ALCL cases using case-control matching to compare survival rates. The characteristics were balanced except organs or systems with lymphoma infiltration after application of this case control method.

Patients with only death certificates or autopsy records or without complete survival rate data and follow-up information were excluded from the study. The following variables were extracted from the SEER database: sex, age, race, marital status, Ann Arbor stage, diagnosis year, and treatment. We classified race as white, black, and others. Marital status was divided into married, unmarried, or unknown. Treatment was divided into chemotherapy alone, surgery alone, combination therapy of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and combination therapy of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Five patients diagnosed with HSTL at Hunan Cancer Hospital were also included in this study. All diagnoses were confirmed by examination of pathologic characteristics and immunohistochemical staining. The detailed clinicopathological information of the enrolled patients was retrospectively extracted from the medical records. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Hunan Cancer Hospital. Informed consent was provided by all patients before the study.

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical data. Medians and ranges were used to describe continuous variables. The chi-square test or t-test was used for univariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the impact factors. In the Cox regression, the following variables were included: sex, age, race, marital status, Ann Arbor stage and treatment.

Disease-specific survival (DSS) was estimated as the time of diagnosis to the time of death from lymphoma; other deaths were censored at the date of death. OS was determined from the date of diagnosis to the date of either death or the end of follow-up. The survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the Log rank test. We used a Cox regression model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for variables. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 (two tailed). Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.0 software (IBM Co, New York, Armonk).

Results

Characteristics of Patients with Hepatosplenic T Cell Lymphoma

A total of 123 HSTCLs were included in the study from the SEER database. The baseline characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1. The median age of all patients at diagnosis was 40 years (range, 6–83), and 81.3% of patients were aged younger than 60 years. Hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma had a male predominance. The majority of patients were diagnosed with Ann Arbor stage III–IV disease. Organs or systems with lymphoma infiltration of HSTCL were more common in the spleen (121/123, 98.4%). In total, only five patients (5/123, 0.4%) underwent surgery of organs or systems with lymphoma infiltration. The majority of patients (102/123, 82.9%) received chemotherapy alone, and (16/123, 13.0%) received radiotherapy alone. Sixteen patients (16/123, 13%) received chemotherapy combined with topical treatment (surgery [n = 5] or radiotherapy [n = 11]).

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Hepatosplenic T Cell Lymphoma from the SEER database

Characteristics	Original Data Set				P value	Matched-1 Data Set			Matched-2 Data Set
	HSTCL	PTCL-NOS	P value	ALK+ ALCL		HSTCL	PTCL-NOS	P value	HSTCL	ALK+ ALCL	P value
	N=123	N=6794		N= 4017		N= 116	N=116		N=113	N=113
Year of diagnosis, N(%)			0.002		0.006
1975–1995	0(0.0)	496(7.3)		236(5.9)		0	0		0	0
1996–2016	123(100.0)	6298(92.7)		3781(94.1)		116	116		113	113
Median age (range)	40(6–83)	64(0–100)	0.125	54(0–103)	0.011	41 (6–83)	53(10–94)	0.831	43(6–83)	46(11–88)	0.973
Age group, N(%)			<0.001		<0.001			1			1
≤60	100(81.3)	2802(41.2)		2440(60.7)		93(80.2)	93(80.2)		90(79.6)	90(79.6)
>60	23(18.7)	3992(58.8)		1577(39.3)		23(19.8)	23(19.8)		23(20.4)	23(20.4)
Gender, N (%)			0.033		0.084			1
Female	38(30.9)	2744(40.4)		1550(38.6)		36(31.0)	36(31.0)		34(30.1)	34(30.1)	1
Male	85(69.1)	4050(59.6)		2467(61.4)		80(69.0)	80(69.0)		79(69.9)	79(69.9)
Ann-Arbor Stage, N (%)			<0.001		<0.001			1			1
I–II	22(17.9)	2153(31.7)		1784(44.4)		20(17.2)	20(17.2)		19(16.8)	19(16.8)
III–IV	87(70.7)	3548(52.2)		1821(45.3)		84(72.4)	84(72.4)		82(72.6)	82(72.6)
Unknown	14(11.4)	1093(16.1)		412(10.3)		12(10.3)	12(10.3)		12(10.6)	12(10.6)
OSLI, N (%)			<0.001		<0.001			<0.001			<0.001
Nodal	0(0.0)	4549(67.0)		2941(73.2)		0(0.0)	80(69.0)		19(13.5)	89(78.8)
Head and neck	0(0.0)	299(4.3)		89(2.2)		0(0.0)	4(3.4)		0(0.0)	3(2.7)
GI	0(0.0)	305(4.5)		160(4.0)		0(0.0)	7(6.0)		0(0.0)	3(2.7)
CNS	0(0.0)	64(0.9)		38(0.9)		0(0.0)	1(0.9)		0(0.0)	0(0.0)
Liver	2(1.6)	36(0.5)		17(0.4)		1(0.9)	1(0.9)		2(1.8)	0(0.0)
Spleen	121(98.4)	67(1.0)		17(0.4)		115(99.1)	2(1.7)		111(98.2)	0(0.0)
Skin	0(0.0)	957(14.1)		382(9.5)		0(0.0)	7(6.0)		0(0.0)	5(4.4)
Bone marrow	0(0.0)	162(2.4)		12(0.3)		0(0.0)	0(0.0)		0(0.0)	0(0.0)
Others	0(0.0)	329(4.8)		353(8.8)		0(0.0)	14(12.1)		2(1.4)	13(11.5)
Unknown	0(0.0)	26(0.4)		8(0.2)		0(0.0)	0(0.0)		0(0.0)	0(0.0)
Surgery of OSLI, N (%)			<0.001		<0.001			NA			1
No/unknown	118(95.9)	6749(99.3)		3987(99.3)		116(100.0)	116(100.0)		113(100.0)	113(100.0)
Yes	5(4.1)	45(0.7)		30(0.7)		0(0.0)	0(0.0)		0(0.0)	0(0.0)
Radiation alone, N (%)			0. 901		0.048			1			1
No/unknown	107(87.0)	5884(86.6)		3203(79.7)		101(87.1)	101(87.1)		100(88.5)	100(88.5)
Yes	16(13.0)	910(13.4)		814(20.3)		15(12.9)	15(12.9)		13(11.5)	13(11.5)
Chemotherapy alone, N (%)			<0.001		0.004			1			1
No/unknown	21(17.1)	2730(40.2)		1169(29.1)		18(15.5)	18(15.5)		17(15.0)	17(15.0)
Yes	102 (82.9)	4064(59.8)		2848(70.9)		98 (84.5)	98 (84.5)		96(85.0)	96(85.0)

Abbreviations: ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; OSLI, Organs or systems with lymphoma infiltration; GI, gastrointestinal; CNS, central nervous system; HSTCL, hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma; NA, not available; PTCL-NOS, peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified.

Among the five patients from China, the majority were younger and male, and organs with lymphoma infiltration were more common in the spleen, which was consistent with the findings in the SEER database. In addition, we also found that patients were more likely to have B symptoms, bone marrow involvement, cytopenia, abnormal liver transaminase levels, and elevated LDH and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. The clinical characteristics of the five patients with HSTCL are shown in Table 2. Only two patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and in total, the response rate to first-line therapy was not high. One patient had hemophagocytic cells in the bone marrow at diagnosis. The results of the main immunophenotypic studies are summarized in Table 3. TCR expression was determined in one patient, and TCRγ was positive. CD3 was positive in 4/5 cases. All cases tested were positive for CD2 (n = 2), GrB (n =2), and TIA1 (n =4). CD20 (n = 5), Epstein-Barr virus–encoded small RNA (n = 5), CD30 (n = 3), PAX-5 (n = 4), CD79a (n = 2), ALK (n = 3) and TdT (n = 2) were negative in all cases tested. The details of staging, treatment, efficacy, and survival outcome are shown in Table 4. None of the 5 patients received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Table 2 Clinical Characteristics of Five Chinese Patients with Hepatosplenic T Cell Lymphoma

Characteristics	No of Patients (%)
Age (median, range), year	43 (18–68)
Gender (Male: Female)	4:1
Marital status (Married: Unmarried)	4:1
Advanced Stage	4 (80%)
B symptoms	3 (60%)
BM involvement	4 (80%)
Splenomegaly	5 (100%)
Hepatomegaly	3 (60%)
Lymphadenopathy	0 (0%)
Leukopenia	3 (60%)
Thrombocytopenia	4 (80%)
Anemia	4 (80%)
Elevated TB	3 (60%)
Elevated ALT	3 (60%)
Elevated AST	3 (60%)
Elevated ALP	4 (80%)
Elevated LDH	4 (80%)
Splenectomy	5 (100%)
Radiation alone	0 (0%)
Chemotherapy	5 (100%)
Chemo with anthracycline	2 (40%)
CR/CRu to first line therapy	2 (40%)
PFS (median, range), mos	6.9 (1.3–11.9)
OS (median, range), mos	13.3 (1.5–45.3)

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BM, bone marrow; CR/Cru, complete remission/ unconfirmed complete remission; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival; TB, total bilirubin.

Table 3 The Main Immunophenotypic Features of 5 Chinese Cases with Hepatosplenic T Cell Lymphoma

Marker	Patient 1	Patient 2	Patient 3	Patient 4	Patient 5
CD2	+	NA	NA	NA	+
CD3	+	–	+	+	+
CD5	+	NA	–	–	NA
CD7	+	NA	+	NA	–
CD4	+	NA	–	–	+
CD8	NA	NA	–	–	+
CD79a	NA	NA	–	NA	–
CD56	–	+	+	+	+
CD68	NA	+	–	+	+
CD20	–	–	–	–	–
CD30	–	NA	–	NA	–
GrB	+	NA	+	NA	NA
Pax5	–	–	–	NA	–
ALK	–	NA	–	NA	–
TIA1	+	NA	+	+	+
MPO	+	–	NA	NA	+
TdT	–	NA	NA	–	NA
EBERS	–	–	–	–	–
Ki67	35%+	30%+	80%+	35%+	5%+
TCR expression	NA	NA	NA	TCRγ(+)	NA

Abbreviation: NA, not available.

Table 4 The Staging, Treatment, Outcome, and Survival of 5 Chinese Cases with Hepatosplenic T Cell Lymphoma

	Ann-Arbor Stage	Therapy and Response for Therapy	Outcome	Survival (Months)
Patient 1	IVB	Gem+VP-16+DXM×1, PD; EPOCH+ Chidamide×2, SD; BFM×2, CR	AND	31.6
Patient 2	IB	COP×4, CR; VP-16×2, PD; P-Gemox×6, CR	AND	45.3
Patient 3	IVA	CHOP-B×1, PD; VP-16×1, PD	DOD	1.3
Patient 4	IVA	P-Gemox+Thalidomide×1, PR; Doxorubicin liposome×1, PR; Doxorubicin liposome+ Paclitaxel×1, CR	AND	12.5
Patient 5	IVB	VP-16 PO for 1year, PD	DOD	13.3

Abbreviations: Gem, gemcitabine; VP −16, etoposide; DXM, dexamethasone; PD, progressive disease; EPOCH, etoposide+prednisone+ vincristine+ doxorubicin+ cyclophosphamide; SD, stable disease; BFM, Berlin Frankfurt Munster; CR, complete remission; AND, alive with no evidence of disease; COP, cyclophosphamide+vincristine+ prednisone; P-Gemox, peg-asparaginase+ gemcitabine+oxaliplatin; CHOP-B, cyclophosphamide+ doxorubicin +vincristine+ prednisone+ bleomycin; DOD, died of disease; PR, partial remission.

Compared with PTCL-NOS, patients with HSTCL of SEER tended to be younger (81.3% vs 41.2%, P < 0.001), male (69.1% vs 59.6%, P = 0.033), unmarried (56.9% vs 38.6%, P < 0.001) and more common among Blacks (22.7% vs 15.8%, P = 0.005). These can also be observed when compared with patients with ALK+ ALCL, except for sex and marital status. In addition, more patients with HSTCL were diagnosed at an advanced stage than patients with PTCL-NOS (70.7% vs 52.5%, P < 0.001) or ALK+ ALCL (70.7% vs 45.3%, P < 0.001). Presentation in spleen was also more frequent than PTCL-NOS (98.4% vs 1.0%, P < 0.001) or ALK+ ALCL (98.4% vs 0.4%, P < 0.001). The characteristics were well balanced between the patients with HSTCL or with PTCL-NOS except the organs or systems with lymphoma infiltration using the case-control matching method (Table 1, matched-1 dataset). HSTCL cases and ALK+ ALCL cases were also well matched (Table 1, matched-2 dataset).

Overall Survival

After a median follow-up of 9 months (range, 0–131), 76 patients with HSTCL had died; among them, 61/76 (80.3%) had stage III–IV disease at diagnosis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates in the entire HSTCL cohort were 56.9% (95% CI, 47.5–66.3%), 37.6% (95% CI, 28.0–47.2%), and 31.6.0% (95% CI, 22.2–41.0%), respectively.

The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates in all patients with PTCL-NOS were 54.1% (95% CI, 52.9–55.3%), 38.7% (95% CI, 37.5–39.9%), and 32.6% (95% CI, 31.4–33.8%), respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates in all ALK+ ALCL patients were 67.5% (95% CI, 66.1–68.9%), 57.5% (95% CI, 55.9–59.1%), and 52.9% (95% CI, 51.3–54.5%), respectively.

The overall survival of HSTCL patients was similar to that of PTCL-NOS patients (P = 0.128), which was also observed in the matched dataset (P = 0.103). Moreover, the overall survival was better in the ALK+ ALCL cohorts than in the HSTCL cohort (P < 0.001). The same tendency was found in the matched dataset (P =0.001). These results are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Overall survival curves of patients with hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma. OS of patients with HSTCL were compared with that in patients with PTCL-NOS among the entire cohort (A) and the same comparison also made between the entire HSTCL cohort and the entire ALK+ ALCL cohort (B). OS of patients with HSTCL were compared with that of patients with PTCL-NOS among the match cohort (C), and OS of patients with HSTCL were compared with that in patients with ALK+ ALCL among the matched cohort (D).

Abbreviations: ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; HSTCL, hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma; OS, overall survival; PTCL-NOS, peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified.

In the entire HSTCL cohort, age, sex, Ann Arbor stage, race, marital status, and treatment demonstrated no difference in OS. Among patients with primary spleen and liver HSTCL, the Kaplan–Meier curve showed that the treatment regimen affected overall survival (Figures 2A and B). The 1-year OS rates were 75.0% (95% CI, 32.5–100.0%), 63.6% (95% CI, 35.2–92.0%), 51.9% (95% CI, 29.0–74.8%), 49.2% (95% CI, 38.4–60.0%), and 0% for patients who received surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy combination therapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy combination therapy, no or unknown therapy, chemotherapy alone or surgery alone, respectively (P = 0.006). Cox regression analyses among HSTCL indicated that surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy combination therapy were significantly associated with better OS (P = 0.001). However, age, sex, Ann Arbor stage, race and marital status were not significantly associated with OS (Table 5).

Table 5 Cox Regression Analysis for Survival of Hepatosplenic T Cell Lymphoma Patients

Characteristics	Overall Survival		Lymphoma-Specific Survival
	HR (95% CI)	P value	HR (95% CI)	P value
Age group
≤60	Ref		Ref
>60	1.184(0.592–2.369)	0.632	1.304(0.606–2.806)	0.497
Gender
Female	Ref		Ref
Male	0.860(0.526–1.404)	0.546	0.886(0.508–1.547)	0.671
Race
White	Ref		Ref
Black	1.293(0.644–2.597)	0.470	1.440(0.642–3.232)	0.376
Other	1.704(0.797–3.642)	0.169	1.834(0.772–4.356)	0.170
Marital status
Married	Ref		Ref
Unmarried	2.019(0.688–5.927)	0.201	2.248(0.650–7.771)	0.201
Unknown	1.792(0.617–5.204)	0.283	2.041(0.596–6.994)	0.256
Ann-Arbor Stage
I–II	Ref		Ref
III–IV	0.529(0.177–1.577)	0.253	0.423(0.119–1.501)	0.183
Unknown	0.913(0.351–2.371)	0.851	0.943(0.325–2.739)	0.914
Treatment
No/unknown	Ref
Chemotherapy alone	2.195(0.705–6.830)	0.175	2.089(0.577–7.572)	0.262
Surgery alone	1.978(0.766–5.108)	0.159	2.128(0.737–6.145)	0.163
Surgery + radiotherapy + chemotherapy	48.105(4.659–496.691)	0.001	92.026(7.828–1081.818)	0.000
Radiotherapy + chemotherapy	1.175(0.217–6.378)	0.852	0.826(0.088–7.771)	0.868

Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to the different treatment. Overall survival curves (A) and disease-specific survival curves (B) were made in the patients with primary spleen and liver HSTCL, respectively.

Abbreviation: HSTCL, hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma.

Disease-Specific Survival

In total, 66/83 (79.5%) patients with HSTCL died of causes related to HSTCL, whereas 17/83 (20.5%) died of causes not related to lymphoma. The 5-year DSS rates in all patients with HSTCL, PTCL-NOS and ALK+ ALCL were 46.4% (95% CI, 35.4–57.4%), 49.8% (95% CI, 48.4–51.2%), and 66.3% (95% CI, 64.7–67.9%), respectively.

A significant difference in DSS was detected between patients with HSTCL and those who were diagnosed with PTCL-NOS (Figure 3A, P = 0.002) and between patients with HSTCL and patients with ALK+ ALCL (Figure 3B, P < 0.001) among the entire cohort. Concordantly, this tendency of DSS was also found in the matched dataset. Patients with PTCL-NOS showed better DSS than those who were diagnosed with HSTCL (Figure 3C, P = 0.033), and patients with ALK+ ALCL showed better DSS than those who were diagnosed with HSTCL (Figure 3D, P = 0.016). Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the treatment regimen also affected DSS (P = 0.001). Cox regression analyses demonstrated that patients who received surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy combination therapy had better DSS than those who received other treatments (P < 0.001). Age, sex, Ann Arbor stage, race, and marital status were not significantly associated with DSS.

Figure 3 Disease-specific survival curves of patients with hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma. DSS of patients with HSTCL were compared with that in patients with PTCL-NOS among the entire cohort (A) and the same comparison also made between the entire HSTCL cohort and the entire ALK+ ALCL cohort (B). DSS of patients with HSTCL were compared with that of patients with PTCL-NOS among the match cohort (C), and DSS of patients with HSTCL were compared with that in patients with ALK+ ALCL among the matched cohort (D).

Abbreviations: ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; HSTCL, hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma; DSS, disease-specific survival; PTCL-NOS, peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified.

Discussion

Since the name hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma was used in 1990, few case series of HSTCL have been reported.^{5,7–10,12,14} The largest reported cohort of 31 patients was from a prospective trial T Cell Project.⁵ However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first population-based study of HSTCL patients using the SEER database.

The etiology of the majority of patients with HSTCL is unclear. Most of HSTCL were de novo. Approximately 20% of HSTCL was found in immunocompromised patients, including patients with solid organ transplant, chronic steroid use, some types of autoimmune disorders, and primary hematologic malignancies.¹⁵ In addition, HSTCL was reported to be associated with inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn’s disease, which is thought to have contributed to 10% of HSTCL patients.¹⁵ In our study, only one patient had allergic rhinitis among the five patients with a medical history from the medical records at Hunan Cancer Hospital. Several studies have also suggested that some drugs, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) inhibitors, may increase the risk of HSTCL,^7,16 however, it was controversial.^16–18 These results indicated that the impairment of the immune system and chronic antigenic stimulation may play a role in the genesis of HSTCL. HSTCL is not associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and EBER (EBV-encoded small RNA) is usually negative,¹¹ which is consistent with our findings.

Our study showed that patients with HSTCL in both the SEER and Hunan cohorts had a higher proportion of young patients and a strong male predominance, which is in concordance with prior studies.^2,7,9 The proportion of spleen invasion in HSTCL is higher than that in ALK+ ALCL and PTCL-NOS. Primary liver involvement is rare. In most reported cases, bone marrow involvement was common. Among the five patients from China, 80% had bone marrow involvement, and this ratio was also very high. It is worth noting that one patient aged 18 was diagnosed with hemophagocytic syndrome at baseline but recovered after the first cycle of chemotherapy. The study by showed that hemophagocytic syndrome is uncommon in patients with HSTCL.⁷ However, it may be a major cause of morbidity in HSTL.

As the pathologic data of HSTL from SEER are unavailable, it is impossible to analyze the correlation between the pathological parameters and prognosis in the SEER cohort. The main immunophenotypic features of 5 Chinese patients with HSTCL are in concordance with those of patients from prior studies.^5,7,11 It is worth noting that all but one patient had low expression of Ki-67 (<70%). The expression of Ki-67 has been widely used as an index to evaluate the proliferative activity of lymphoma. High Ki-67 expression is considered to be a poor prognostic factor in many types of lymphoma, such as mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and peripheral T-cell lymphomas.^19–24 However, its prognostic value for HSTCL remains unclear. Among the 5 Chinese cases, the survival time of Patient 3 with a high expression of Ki-67 (80%) was only 1.3 months, which was clearly shorter than the survival time of the other 4 patients (31.6 months, 45.3 months, 12.5 months, 13.3 months, respectively). This suggests that Ki-67 may be a very effective prognostic indicator for HSTCT, which needs to be confirmed by more studies with larger sample sizes. Another notable pathological parameter is CD56, which is positive in the majority of HSTCL cases.¹¹ All but one patient had negative expression of CD56 (Patient 1) in our Hunan cohort, which is in concordance with prior studies.^8,11 The prognostic value of CD56 expression for lymphoma is still contradictory and inconclusive. CD56 expression is considered an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, anaplastic large cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.^25–27 However, Wang et al did show that CD56-negative extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma had significantly inferior survival outcomes.²⁸ The CD56-negative patient (Patient 1) in our study was alive for 31.6 months until the last follow-up. It appears that the correlation between CD56 expression and outcomes in patients with HSCTL should be clarified by investigating a larger number of cases in the future.

The majority of patients with HSTCL in SEER received chemotherapy. Unfortunately, treatment of HSTCL is not successful using chemotherapy alone. The median follow-up of patients who received chemotherapy was 9 (0–131) months. The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates of HSTCL patients who received chemotherapy were 52.9% and 31.2%, respectively, which were not significantly different from those of patients who did not receive chemotherapy. The combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy seemed to be better. Currently, no standard therapy is recommended. In SEER patients, the regimens of chemotherapy could be split into with or without anthracycline. Chemotherapy regimens without anthracycline were mainly based on pegaspase and gemcitabine. The chemotherapy regimen with anthracycline was CHOP-like in most cases. The median survival of patients who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy seemed to be longer than that of patients without anthracycline-based chemotherapy. However, there was no difference in survival between these two types of regimens (median OS: 13.2 months vs 10.3 months, P = 0.474). The efficacy of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was also previously reported to be disappointing.^5,8,9 Patients who received these chemotherapy regimens survived for less than 9 months.²⁹ More intensive regimens, such as HyperCIDDDoxil (fractionated cyclophosphamide, liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine and dexamethasone) alternating with methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine, tended to perform better. The median OS was 11 months.⁸ Several studies have suggested that both autologous (autoSCT) and allogeneic (allo-SCT) transplants may be a potentially curative treatment option. A systematic review of 44 patients who received allo-SCT demonstrated that the estimated 3-year OS for transplants was 56%.¹⁰ Moreover, allo-SCT tended to have a better result than autoSCT.^11,30 However, the nonrelapse mortality rate of allo-SCT was as high as 68%.¹⁰ The data mentioned above are limited to small retrospective studies and case series, and further multicenter studies with larger samples are needed to quantify this benefit.

It is worth noting that the 5-year OS rate is 31.6% for HSTCL from SEER, which is much better than that in a previously published study (5-year OS for nontransplanted patients <10%; Pro et al, Blood 2020).¹¹ The possible reason for the difference in the 5-year OS rate between the SEER cohort and patients who of Pro et al are as follows: a) the sample size of the study from Pro was small (only 18 patients); however, the SEER cohort included 123 cases. b) In the study of Pro et al, up to 95% of patients with stage 3 or stage 4 disease, while only 70.7% of the patients in the SEER cohort were staged advanced. c) The enrollment time of patients in the study of Pro et al was from 1990 to 2002, while the enrollment time of patients in the SEER database was from 1996 to 2016. This makes patients from SEER more likely to use new drugs (such as brentuximab vedotin, romidepsin, pralatrexate, etc.). d) The final reason is that some patients in the SEER database may undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but we cannot obtain the specific proportion of transplanted patients because SEER does not provide publicly available data.

The prognosis of patients with HSTCL is usually poor. We found that patients with HSTCL had similar overall survival compared with PTCL-NOS patients but significantly worse overall survival than ALK+ ALCL patients. T-cell lymphoma is a group of heterogeneous malignancies. Advances in gene expression profiling, next-generation sequencing and other genomics studies provide the chance to have a better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the diverse biology of HSTCL, which helps the differential diagnosis from other types of lymphoma and suggests potential targets for therapy, prognosis factors and further improvement of diagnostic criteria.

The source of PTCL cells is associated with prognosis. The vast majority of PTCLs arise from alpha-beta T cells, while cases of HSTCL are more frequently composed of gamma delta T-cells and rare of the alpha-beta phenotype. Gamma–delta T cells are important to mucosal immunity.¹⁵ Previous studies have demonstrated that the alpha-beta phenotype showed a higher incidence in women.^12,31 Patients with HSTCL expressing the alpha-beta T-cell receptor had a poorer prognosis.⁷ One of the five patients from the Hunan cohort detected TCR expression, which suggested that TCRγ was positive. He received chemotherapy without anthracycline, and the survival time was 13.3 months. We found that chemotherapy combined with topical treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) was significantly associated with better OS among patients with HSTCL.

There are some limitations in our study. First, the SEER database does not provide detailed information about chemotherapy regimens, making it impossible to conduct subgroup analysis to compare the efficacy differences of different chemotherapy regimens. Second, the time span is relatively large, which may increase the heterogeneity of the treatment of patients. Third, the lack of biomarker information of HSTCL in the SEER database makes prognostic analysis related to tumor markers impossible. Finally, selection bias was inevitable in this retrospective study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this is the first population-based study of patients with HSTCL using the SEER database. We demonstrated a higher proportion of young patients with HSTCL and a strong male predominance. The organs or systems with lymphoma infiltration of HSTCL were more common in spleen than ALK+ ALCL and PTCL-NOS. Patients with HSTCL had similar overall survival compared with PTCL-NOS cases, but significantly worse than ALK+ ALCL. In addition, we identified that chemotherapy combined with topical treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) was an independent impact factor among patients with HSTCL. Broader multi-institutional collaborations are needed to intensify efforts in dealing with this rare but unfavorable disease.

Ethical Disclosure

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations.

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks to the SEER for allowing us to obtain the original data.

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This work is supported by Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2021JJ30425), Changsha Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. kq2014206), the grants from Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province National Health Commission (No. 20201659), and the grants from the Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department (No. 2016JJ3083, No. 2017SK2130).