Abstract
Purpose:
Antibodies are key reagents in the development of immunoassay. We attempted to develop high-performance CPP immunoassays using high-affinity monoclonal antibodies prepared via cytokine-assisted immunization.
Methods:
We used fetal liver tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L), CC subtype chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to assist traditional subcutaneous immunization of preparing high-affinity monoclonal antibodies, and further to develop high-performance immunoassay methods for CPP.
Results:
This novel immune strategy significantly enhanced immune response against CPP. Six anti-CPP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with high affinity were successfully screened and selected for application in a fully automated magnetic chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). This robust and rapid assay can efficiently detect CPP in the range of 1.2–1250 pmol L–1 with a detection limit of 6.25 pmol L–1. Significantly, the whole incubation process can be completed in 30 min as compared to about 4.5 hr for the control ELISA kit. Furthermore, this assay exhibited high sensitivity and specificity, low intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs < 15%). The developed assay was applied in the detection of CPP in 115 random serum samples and results showed a high correlation with data obtained using a commercially available ELISA kit (correlation coefficient, 0.9737).
Conclusion:
Our assay could be applied in the point-of-care testing of CPP in the serum samples, and also the method developed in this study could be adopted to explore the detection and diagnosis of other biomarkers for various diseases.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the Program of Guangdong Provincial Science & Technology (2017A020208014) and the Program of Guangzhou Science & Technology (201802010030).
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Supplementary materials
Table 1 The concentration of standard CPP solutions (pmol L−1)
Table 2 Comparison of performance CPP detection methods
Table 3 Intra-assay and inter-assay tests
Table S1 The comparison of subcutaneous and cytokine-assisted immunization
Table S2 The affinity of the antibodies prepared via cytokine-assisted immunization
Table S3 Stability of the reagents at store (n=3)
Table S4 Cross-reactivity of CLIA to related compounds
Figure S1 Purification results of the mAb against CPP by SDS–PAGE.Notes: Lane 1: 6-20G5; lane 2: 6-8D2; lane 3: 6-18H3; lane 4: 6-5G8; lane 5: 6-2A9 ; lane 6: 6-3C10 ; lane 7: 6-18G10 ; lane 8: 6-11C3. There were only two straps after the mAb was purified, and these were heavy chain and light chain, respectively, CV. The results indicate that the purity of all mAbs was above 90% as analyzed on SDS-PAGE.Abbreviations: mAb, monoclonal antibody; CV, coefficient of variation
![Figure S1 Purification results of the mAb against CPP by SDS–PAGE.Notes: Lane 1: 6-20G5; lane 2: 6-8D2; lane 3: 6-18H3; lane 4: 6-5G8; lane 5: 6-2A9 ; lane 6: 6-3C10 ; lane 7: 6-18G10 ; lane 8: 6-11C3. There were only two straps after the mAb was purified, and these were heavy chain and light chain, respectively, CV. The results indicate that the purity of all mAbs was above 90% as analyzed on SDS-PAGE.Abbreviations: mAb, monoclonal antibody; CV, coefficient of variation](/cms/asset/321762eb-8166-43b9-a4ff-287646a11d75/dijn_a_12190855_sf0001.jpg)