Abstract
Purpose
Physician adoption of online medical services (OMS) has been hastened by the COVID-19 pandemic, but their adoption willingness still requires to be improved. This study aims to construct a physician’s OMS adoption willingness model based on the information-motivation-behavioral skill (IMB) theory, explore the determinants affecting adoption willingness and its influencing pathways, and evaluate the moderating effects of OMS use experience on willingness through multi-group analysis.
Participants and Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among physicians in three public hospitals of Jiangsu province, China, from June to July 2020, using a multi-stage sampling method. Structural equation modeling was applied to analyze the valid data from 531 respondents.
Results
Physicians’ willingness to adopt OMS was at a moderate level, with an average score of 14.27±3.34 (range: 4–20). The behavior model for physician’s OMS adoption willingness fitted well. Information (In), motivation (Mo), and behavioral skill (BS) explained 69% of the variance in adoption willingness (AW). Information could only exert completely indirect effect on willingness via behavioral skills (b = 0.202, 95% CI[0.122, 0.314]); motivation could both generate direct effect (β=0.368, p < 0.001) and partial indirect effect on willingness via behavioral skills (b = 0.160, 95% CI[0.092, 0.248]); and behavioral skills had a positive effect on willingness (β=0.424, p < 0.001). Furthermore, OMS use experience showed a significant moderating effect on the Mo → AW pathway, with inexperienced physicians’ willingness being significantly stronger influenced by motivation compared to experienced ones.
Conclusion
Findings from this study revealed the role of IMB model in interpreting and predicting physicians’ willingness to adopt OMS and the moderating effect of uptake experience, providing practitioners with a theoretical foundation and intervention framework for supporting OMS development efforts.
Ethics Approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Nanjing Medical University (No. (2020)592). All participants in this study provided oral informed consent.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the physicians for their participation.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.