70
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

A randomized, double-blind study of hydromorphone hydrochloride extended-release tablets versus oxycodone hydrochloride extended-release tablets for cancer pain: efficacy and safety in Japanese cancer patients (EXHEAL: a Phase III study of EXtended-release HydromorphonE for cAncer pain reLief)

, , , , &
Pages 1953-1962 | Published online: 18 Aug 2017
 

Abstract

Background

In Japan, there are limited options for switching opioid analgesics. Hydromorphone is an opioid analgesic that is routinely used instead of morphine for cancer pain; however, it is not yet available in Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone (DS-7113b) extended-release tablets in opioid-naïve patients with cancer pain not relieved by non-opioid analgesics.

Subjects and methods

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. A double-dummy method was used for blinding. Each randomized subject received either hydromorphone extended-release tablets plus placebo oxycodone hydrochloride extended-release tablets 4 mg/day (n=88) or placebo hydromorphone extended-release tablets plus oxycodone hydrochloride extended-release tablets 10 mg/day (n=93) orally for 7 days (once-daily dosing for hydromorphone and twice-daily dosing for oxycodone). The doses were adjusted as necessary. Efficacy was evaluated by change in visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline to completion of treatment.

Results

The between-group difference in least squares mean changes in VAS score from baseline to completion or discontinuation of treatment was −0.4 mm (95% CI −5.9 to 5 mm) by analysis of covariance where the baseline VAS score was used as a covariate. The upper limit of the 95% CI was below 10 mm, which was predefined as the noninferiority limit. This verified the noninferiority of hydromorphone tablets relative to oxycodone tablets. The incidence of adverse events was 80.7% (71 of 88) in the hydromorphone group and 83.7% (77 of 93) in the oxycodone group. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, somnolence, diarrhea, and constipation, most of which are commonly observed with opioid analgesics.

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of hydromorphone extended-release tablets were equivalent to those of the oxycodone extended-release formulation.

Supplementary material

Box S1 Participating institutes
  • Hirosaki National Hospital

  • Mito Red Cross Hospital

  • Mito Medical Center

  • Yuai Memorial Hospital

  • Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital

  • Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital

  • Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital

  • Tochigi Cancer Center

  • Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center

  • Takasaki General Medical Center

  • Ageo Central General Hospital

  • National Hospital Organization Saitama National Hospital

  • National Hospital Organization Chiba Medical Center

  • Chiba Cancer Center

  • Funabashi Municipal Medical Center

  • Chiba Tokushukai Hospital

  • Kanto Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers

  • Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation Toshima Hospital

  • Kanagawa Cancer Center

  • Kawasaki Municipal Hospital

  • Shonan Kamakura General Hospital

  • Aizawa Hospital

  • Japanese Red Cross Society Suwa Hospital, Suwa Red Cross Hospital

  • Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital

  • Yaizu City Hospital

  • Shizuoka Prefectural Hospital Organization, Shizuoka General Hospital

  • Shizuoka Cancer Center

  • Aichi Cancer Center Hospital

  • Toyohashi Medical Center

  • Matsusaka City Hospital

  • Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital

  • Osaka General Medical Center

  • Rinku General Medical Center

  • National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center

  • Saiseikai Noe Hospital

  • Sano Hospital

  • Meiwa Hospital

  • Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital

  • Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation Hospital

  • Okayama Medical Center

  • National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center

  • Iwakuni Clinical Center

  • Japan Community Health Care Organization, Shimonoseki Medical Center

  • Saiseikai Imabari Hospital

  • Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital

  • Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital

  • Japan Community Health Care Organization, Kyushu Hospital

  • Beppu Medical Center

  • Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital

Acknowledgments

This study and preparation of this report were funded by Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd. The authors wish to thank all of the investigators at the participating centers (see Box S1) for their contribution to this study. We would also like to thank Marion Barnett of Edanz Medical Writing for providing editorial support.

Disclosure

SI, AI, and YK are employees of Daiichi Sankyo. YS participated in this study as a medical specialist, and ST and EA functioned as safety assessment advisors. YS has received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.